Live data from Hacker News

How to Become a ‘Superager’

nytimes.com

41–50 of 95 posts

Re: How to Become a ‘Superager’

#41
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Look at the paper linked in the overview that I posted. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....

I did look at that paper. Here is a quote from that paper: > Based on this review, all three approaches to computerized training – classic cognitive training tasks, neuropsychological software, and video games – appear to hold promise for improving cognitive abilities in cognitively normal, community-dwelling older adults who have a higher risk of cognitive decline as they age.

Yes. And note the sample sizes given a sentence further down.

The two best had an n of 12 and 8, respectively.

That's why they said 'appears'. It's suggestive, but the amount of available, good-quality data is surprisingly small.

Re: How to Become a ‘Superager’

#42
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm preaching to the choir, but for the sake of visibility — there is a very inspiring fable that puts aging into another context: http://www.nickbostrom.com/fable/dragon.html

I'm curious if proponents of 'immortality' do not fear a world where there are tremendous social (not to mention environmental) consequences to significantly extended life/health-spans? If you are under a certain age in any country (say Most peoples' formative life views develop in a certain brief segment of their lives, from which their subsequent experiences simply reinforce. It's sadly a rare few that continually…

Suppose that you lived in a world where aging didn't exist, and people typically lived for hundreds of years. (There would still be deaths due to accidents, violence, and occasional disease). And suppose it had exactly the problems you're imagining, where 800 year old oligarchs had accumulated lots of money and power and were preventing changes that younger generations wanted. Would your proposed solution be to release a virus that would gradually cripple everyone's bodies and minds over several decades before eventually killing them?

Re: How to Become a ‘Superager’

#43
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did look at that paper. Here is a quote from that paper: > Based on this review, all three approaches to computerized training – classic cognitive training tasks, neuropsychological software, and video games – appear to hold promise for improving cognitive abilities in cognitively normal, community-dwelling older adults who have a higher risk of cognitive decline as they age.

Yes. And note the sample sizes given a sentence further down. The two best had an n of 12 and 8, respectively. That's why they said 'appears'. It's suggestive, but the amount of available, good-quality data is surprisingly small.

Those are numbers of studies. It's a meta-analysis.

Re: How to Become a ‘Superager’

#47
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. And note the sample sizes given a sentence further down. The two best had an n of 12 and 8, respectively. That's why they said 'appears'. It's suggestive, but the amount of available, good-quality data is surprisingly small.

Those are numbers of studies. It's a meta-analysis.

Then I am apparently mistaken. Thank you for pointing it out.

Re: How to Become a ‘Superager’

#48
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think wealth accumulation is an issue. However, heritage is what heavily contributes to wealth accumulation. With aging gone, and subsequently, heritage heavily delayed, wealth distribution gap will become smaller, not larger. Life expectancy increases tend to decrease birth rate. And with Elon Musk currently working on colonizing Mars, and seasteading making some progress, there will likely be a lot of place…

For as so long we have a positive birthrate, we'll reach the point of using all the energy that our local sun and technology can provide. We'll have to consider population control.

Before you get too worried about this overpopulation, go take a good look at the birth rates in developed countries.

It'll be fine.

Re: How to Become a ‘Superager’

#50
> In the United States, we are obsessed with happiness. But as people get older, research shows, they cultivate happiness by avoiding unpleasant situations.

Someone asked a few days ago what the best habit was that HNers developed last year and what the health benefits were. I realised I shouldn't do things because I thought they'd make me happy, and it has changed everything. Put another way, I don't only do things I think I'm going to enjoy any more.

It's an incredibly powerful mindset to not have an expectation of happiness or enjoyment as an outcome of an action. I used not to do a lot of things because I couldn't see the point or because I thought I wouldn't like them. Now I do those things anyway, more just to see what they're like rather than because I expect to enjoy them. I do things to see what actually happens instead of limiting myself to my own preconceptions.

Most of the time, I'm right, and I don't enjoy those things, but that's OK. They're still showing me different aspects of life and allowing me to exercise arguably our most innate gift, the ability to experience. There have been a few surprises though. I've taken up sports I'd previously discounted, and now I've stuck with them long enough I can see the appeal. I'm learning a musical instrument and get much less frustrated because I see the learning process as just training my brain, a function of time and effort. There's no point in being frustrated.

Now I just view experiences as things to be experienced, without requiring anything more of them. This means there's less pressure on me and on them to give me anything. My attitude to them and awareness of them is more important than deriving happiness and enjoyment.

Now I've written that it reads like zen, but when I practiced zen it was because I wanted to be happy from it. The thing with learning is it's not enough to have the knowledge. You need the insight to really internalise something. It's that "A-ha!" moment. I guess I arrived at the same conclusion as the Zennists from a different direction. Only doing things you think will make you happy is just a way too limiting mindset.

It really has been a complete revolution in my approach to life. I can't recommend it enough. And it looks like this attitude will keep my brain healthy too.

Post reply on HN