Live data from Hacker News

The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

wired.com

301–310 of 363 posts

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#301

In order to afford a decent newer house in the suburban beltway (DC) you need to spend 500k+. That's $2200 a month. Personal property tax on a 3 year old SUV and a new sports car is $2700 yearly. Car insurance is > $300 monthly. Car payments >= $1900 month. (college + personal) Loan repayment = $400 monthly. Food and gas + energy >= $600 monthly. State and federal tax + ss take about 45% of gross. Upper middle class…

Pretty sure you could have 2 brand new GTIs for less than $1900/mo. Holy crap, that's a lot of car.

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#302

The people who write these articles almost always live in California or New York City. I just have to laugh. Move to any major Texan city, any major Floridian city -- really any city in "The South" -- and the situation is much different. There are tons of great properties for unsubsidized, lower class purchasers. Seriously, zillow downtown Nashville TN. You can find great deals for the poorest amongst us. People in (…

Housing doesn't take care of itself. Cities built on the American car-centric model work fine until they reach a certain size and then traffic chokes them and quality of life for everyone goes down. Atlanta, a southern city, is a good example of a city whose economic growth is limited by traffic.

Society and government exist to help us citizens coordinate our efforts to solve problems bigger than any of us. Building public transit and forming density-friendly zoning rules are what we should all be doing together.

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#303
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

London as more than decent public transportation indeed, plus it has this rather extreme car policy we all know about (which by the way I am sure the super rich actually love !). The thing is, I've always wondered why public transportation is so outrageously expensive there. Actually, even with the Oyster card, the rates strike me as rather extreme. I'd love to hear a Londonese on this.

It's partly because the underground is 154 years old, which carries with it its own set of maintenance headaches, partly because of the "public private partnership" programs from 2000s onwards that were set up as a means to extract money from the system and partly because they pay reasonably good wages.

Do most londonese share this feeling of mine that it's kinda expensive or this is just me being a bit dumb? :)

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#305

Huge cities...good riddance. I live nearish to Salt Lake City (whose metro pop. is less than a quarter of Boston's), have tons of software job opportunities, have a 17-20 min commute, and bought a 2k sqft house on 0.19 acres for less than 200k. Big cities are crowded. They have their advantages, but even if they weren't overpriced, I'd probably still prefer my elbow room.

Well good for you, but you don't speak for everyone.

That is quite normal for the SLC area

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#306
post #22

I'm a founder bootstrapping a startup, so at the moment both my income and my assets are very well short of middle class. Nonetheless, I can afford to live in London Zone 2 -- a ten-minute walk away from Tower Bridge -- because I'm happy to live communally with a handful of excellent flatmates. There's nothing wrong with this arrangement, and I think it's an arrangement that will only grow in the future. I'm seeing t…

> because I'm happy to live communally with a handful of excellent flatmates. Television. In a small apartment, if one person is watching TV, the rest of us are locked into it too. Any hope of reading, programming, or any other focused activity goes out the window. After long days in a noisy open-plan office, coming home to other people's blaring TV show wore down my sanity very quickly. No job could possibly be good…

So post some ads locally and make it happen.

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have too many hobbies that take space to live in a place like Barcelona. Where do people work on their hobby car or motorcycle? Where do you do woodworking? Where do you keep your boat or paddle board? Do they have gardens? What about an outdoor kitchen for grilling and smoking? Do their kids have bicycles and scooters and skateboards and baseball gear?

Yes, people in Barcelona smoke, grill, have hobbies, bicycles, etc.

That's not really what my point was.

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#308

In order to afford a decent newer house in the suburban beltway (DC) you need to spend 500k+. That's $2200 a month. Personal property tax on a 3 year old SUV and a new sports car is $2700 yearly. Car insurance is > $300 monthly. Car payments >= $1900 month. (college + personal) Loan repayment = $400 monthly. Food and gas + energy >= $600 monthly. State and federal tax + ss take about 45% of gross. Upper middle class…

The car numbers jump out at me. The rest sounds familiar but you must have some nice cars to run up those car tax, loan, and insurance bills.

For comparison, a couple of 5 year old Japanese cars run me less than $100/month insurance and around $600/year in property tax in NoVA. No payments because we saved up and paid cash, but if there were, they'd be well under $1,900/month.

> State and federal tax + ss take about 45% of gross.

Even after the mortgage deduction? Have you calculated your effective tax rate? Mine is around 30%, including sales taxes.

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#309
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not even true of NYC; it's true of Manhattan and Brooklyn. Is it true of LA? That also sounds wrong to me.

LA homeowner here. Short answer is: not entirely true, as written. The situation is that a vast expanse of the (very large) city of LA, and key enclaves like West Hollywood and Santa Monica (not formally part of LA, but surrounded by it) has had large and steady price increases for the past ~60 months straight. Renters have been priced out of one neighborhood after another. It has caused a huge upheaval as people who…

Here is another comp. (Not cherry picking)

450k for a 2+1, 744 sq. ft. -- https://www.redfin.com/CA/Los-Angeles/3618-Arroyo-Seco-Ave-9...

In a neighborhood with regular gang related homicides -- e.g., https://www.theeastsiderla.com/2016/08/one-dead-in-cypress-p...

Re: The Middle Class Can't Afford to Live in Cities Anymore

#310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We know how to safe six-story buildings in SF are a solved prblem, and developers have no problem following building codes when zoning allows them to build 6 stories.

The problem is that most of the inhabitable stuff in SF is being rented out at >$2500 per studio in those old Victorian homes, and it's not exactly easy to just evict everyone for a few years to build higher density housing. A lot of stuff is also under rent control, and since no new buildings are under RC (and all the new construction I've seen is explicitly luxury ), tearing old things down to build means tearing d…

These issues can be addressed, but in any case they don't seem related to restrictions that limit construction to a certain number of stories.
Post reply on HN