Live data from Hacker News

Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

venngage.com

11–20 of 58 posts

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#11
Discussion from October 2015: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10412465

My take on it is:

HN/Slashdot commenters can be valuable for pointing out what's technically wrong with the product. They also tend to put too much weight on product's shortcomings. However, they are blind to what's right about the product or discount the product's strengths for the non-geek consumer.

However, that doesn't mean that average consumers are ultimately right either. On the one hand, they don't have the technical understanding which often skews the prediction towards market failure. Their naivete just lets them try the product and vote with their wallets. On the other hand, that lack of knowledge leads to unrealistic hypothetical products... e.g. "if they can put a man on the moon, why can't my smartphone battery last 3 months and project a 4k video with 5000 lumens on my living room wall?" (relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1425/)

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#12
There are so many comments on hacker news of the flavor: "Why would anyone use this when you can build it yourself in five minutes using x, y and z open source tools" completely ignoring how much knowledge you have to have retained in order to build it in five minutes.

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#16
There doesn't appear to be any justification given for the eight posts selected for analysis. Given that nearly everything fails, choosing seven well recognized successes and one started that scaled quickly but failed seems an interesting methodological choice. Neither to they present any evidence that anyone is, in fact, obsessing over HN comments. The whole thing is "don't let the haters get you down" tweet expanded endlessly. With a infographic.

One can admire the article as a piece of analysis shaped SEO-bait, even as one despairs over the value it subtracts from the world by existing.

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#17
It would be nice if the Rust evangelists could show a little restraint. When a Rust article is posted (multiple times a day) and people disagree with its greatness there is no need to post even more articles about Rust closely related to the previous stories.

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#18

Oh god, this reminds me of the time I told Bram Cohen that Bit Torrent would never work. Of course, I just didn't understand what he was trying to do. Face, meet egg.

I was once superficially polite to the founder of twitter, while laughing patronizingly on the inside. "So, it's like chat, but with more restrictions and fewer features? Completely unmonetized, and the name literally means ignorant babbling? Huh, cool. Hope it works out for you!"

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#19
I'm not sure how valid this premise of this article is.

I would imagine that most startup founders probably spend maybe 10-15% of their day worrying about HN/Product Hunt comments. I forget who said it (maybe pg?), but HN isn't meant to be used as support board, especially for YC companies. Of course there are exceptions to the rule, especially if there is malfeasance or fraud involved.

Re: Stop Obsessing Over Comments On Hacker News (2015)

#20
This reminds me of something Joel Spolsky said on a podcast several years back. The gist was many newer ideas for startups that turned out to be great, were first met with criticism or labeled bad ideas. Because if the new idea was too obvious, it was probably already done by someone else. (At least that is what I think he meant. Wish I could find the show notes.)
Post reply on HN