Live data from Hacker News

Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs (2015)

plus.google.com

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs (2015)

#41
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The term SRE espouses a philosophy that when SRE has done its job perfectly, there is no operations work because the system is reliable on its own. If you're looking for members of that school of thought, you say SRE. If you're comfortable having a "boiler room" and just need to staff it up, the terms sysadmin and devops work just fine depending on the level of coding involved.

I dig a little bit before commenting (SRE vs DevOps), but SRE as an abbreviation is ugly and reliability is assumed for every subject or role, so, it's redundant.

SRE is about engineering systems to be reliable, which is certainly not a goal taken seriously by default. In a traditional environment the system itself is not reliable and not trying (very hard) to be; rather, the combination of system + pager-carrying operators is reliable.

Many more people are paging operators to do DB replica promotions by hand, than are inplementing distributed consensus algorithms and self-healing distributed databases.

Re: Maslow's Hierarchy of Site Reliability Engineering Needs (2015)

#42
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The term SRE espouses a philosophy that when SRE has done its job perfectly, there is no operations work because the system is reliable on its own. If you're looking for members of that school of thought, you say SRE. If you're comfortable having a "boiler room" and just need to staff it up, the terms sysadmin and devops work just fine depending on the level of coding involved.

I dig a little bit before commenting (SRE vs DevOps), but SRE as an abbreviation is ugly and reliability is assumed for every subject or role, so, it's redundant.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN