Live data from Hacker News

No tipping means better business

tastefulventures.com

1–10 of 550 posts

Re: No tipping means better business

#3
Is the restaurant industry in need of saving, from a restaurant owner's or diner's perspective?

I'm fully on the "tipping is terrible for everyone involved" side, but I wonder if the framing here is based on anything.

Re: No tipping means better business

#4
editorialized title. Tsk.

the tipping situation sucks, but the larger economic problem is effectively due to rent extraction by the landlord. when a restaurant can't afford the rent that, say, a bank can, they are effectively priced out of the market. All excess returns and up going to the land owner. This effectively becomes a variant of baumol's cost disease. Once again, return on capital trumps return on labor.

I remember, many years ago, living in Manhattan: in a short period of time, for restaurants on each corner of an intersection were replaced with four banks. A vibrant spot died.

Re: No tipping means better business

#10
post #4

editorialized title. Tsk. the tipping situation sucks, but the larger economic problem is effectively due to rent extraction by the landlord. when a restaurant can't afford the rent that, say, a bank can, they are effectively priced out of the market. All excess returns and up going to the land owner. This effectively becomes a variant of baumol's cost disease. Once again, return on capital trumps return on labor. I…

This is why I support the land-value tax.

Landlords would only be taxed on the value of their land and not the property they're building.

They're heavily incentivized to develop as much as possible to pay tax, since land-value tax doesn't care about the cost of any improvement you make.

Post reply on HN