Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, I disagree. That's not how the majority of corporations exist today, nor reflects how most people believe they should operate. It's the behavior of a small percentage of large corporations, largely supported by people like you throwing their hands up and going "well, that's just the way of it!" Expecting corporations to behave ethically is no different than expecting people to behave ethically -- and we should…
The laws exist to remove legal culpability. It's not throwing our hands up, it's recognizing the source of the problem. Until we fix the laws, the entire point of a corporation is to diffuse legal responsibility. Yes, it needs to change, but it can't change from the ignorant position that we're fixing leaks and will eventually have a waterproof system. It's intentionally setup to be this way and nothing short of an e…
Similarly, the punishments doled out aren't constrained by matter of law from being effective, but rather, by the dynamic of the system and the willingness of the public to accept it from judges and prosecutors.
My point was that you've been propagandized to believe that the law permits the current system, when really the present system is likely illegal already and instead results from the lack of political will to replace corrupt government officials who enable poor corporate behavior.
The system would be much better if we actually enforced it... Which you guys refuse to demand from officials, because you've bought in to the notion that what they're doing is legal.