Assuming nuclear can slow it, we needed it 20 years ago, not now.
To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
21–30 of 666 posts
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#22What are the latest trends in the nuclear power industry?
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#23When will the mainstream consider it acceptable to talk about reducing consumption (without confusing it with lowering the standard of living) and reducing the population (without confusing it with eugenics)? We waste incredible amounts and a lower population means more goods for everyone. I'm not saying they solve everything. I'm just asking when we can talk about these issues that are a lot easier to implement than…
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
'Basic human nature'is a phrase that assumes a lot of things. How would you characterise this phrase in more detail, as it pertains to this topic? And how would you justify such claims?
The desire to breed is pretty hard wired, species die without it. Sex is only fun because it rewards our desire to breed.
And for what it's worth, humans have no obligations to our evolutionary past. "How we evolved" has no direct bearing on what we want (or 'are meant') to do with our lives. It only determines what we are circumstantially capable of.
EDIT: Here's a nerdy analogy for you. There is a relationship between the "programmer's intent" and the "binary program". But that relation has no bearing whatsoever on the relationship between the "binary program" and the "runtime behavior" of that program. These are independent relationships analgous to the relationship between "evolution" to "individual" and "individual" to "individual desires." (The feed-back which would link these -- from "runtime behavior" to "programmer's intent" -- only happens when the programmer is working, long before you end up with the binary you have when you run the program. In fact, this feedback is only ever employed to generate a completely new binary, never to modify the prior one. Thus ensuring that they cannot be co-dependent relationships, and thus evolution has no ability to determine individual behavior past the point of your DNA being fixed at conception.)
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#25When will the mainstream consider it acceptable to talk about reducing consumption (without confusing it with lowering the standard of living) and reducing the population (without confusing it with eugenics)? We waste incredible amounts and a lower population means more goods for everyone. I'm not saying they solve everything. I'm just asking when we can talk about these issues that are a lot easier to implement than…
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#26True or false: a nuclear reactor can create a nuclear explosion? (the answer may surprise you!)
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#27True or false: a nuclear reactor can create a nuclear explosion? (the answer may surprise you!)
Is the answer "yes"? "Yes" is the only answer that would surprise me. Because the answer is no. It can't.
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#28Assuming nuclear can slow it, we needed it 20 years ago, not now.
Yes, yes, the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, the second best is today. Is nuclear any different? I am unaware of anything about nuclear energy that would have worked 20 years ago but is a bad idea to do today.
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
The desire to breed is pretty hard wired, species die without it. Sex is only fun because it rewards our desire to breed.
Sex is fun irrespective of it causing breeding. They are evolutionarily linked, but the have no moral relationship within the human brain. The desire to have sex and the desire to have children are for most people, completely independent desires. And for what it's worth, humans have no obligations to our evolutionary past. "How we evolved" has no direct bearing on what we want (or 'are meant') to do with our lives. I…
Re: To Slow Global Warming, We Need Nuclear Power (Op-Ed)
#30When will the mainstream consider it acceptable to talk about reducing consumption (without confusing it with lowering the standard of living) and reducing the population (without confusing it with eugenics)? We waste incredible amounts and a lower population means more goods for everyone. I'm not saying they solve everything. I'm just asking when we can talk about these issues that are a lot easier to implement than…
We've been splitting atoms for 70 years. France has run its electric grid on 80% nuclear power. What's our track record on reducing consumption and population? Not saying we shouldn't do them all, but I don't think nuclear is the most difficult of these three.
As for the latter, it's great actually. Lifting people out of poverty and keeping their kids alive lowers their birth rate.