Live data from Hacker News

Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

techcrunch.com

441–450 of 623 posts

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#441
post #401

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For people with ESC in muscle memory, that's a non starter.

It will take you a couple of days to adapt, and it's good for your brain plasticity.

You must be young. I've been using the same Emacs bindings for 35 years. I've changed my muscle memory before, and it took far longer than "a couple of days to adapt."

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#442

Well then how 'bout an ARM version with a touch screen, battery that lasts three days and the ability run IOS apps in a container...

Apple is opposed to touchscreen laptops. iOS is optimized for touch gestures. You won’t see iOS apps intended for actual use on ARM MacBooks.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#443

Personally, luxury laptop lines don't make sense for me at this point. There was a time when it was the only way to get decent hardware, but those days are long gone. Four years ago I spilled water on my 2009 17" MBP (RIP) and Apple wanted $1200 for the repair. Instead, I spent ~$1300, including three-year accident-protection insurance where they show up at your house THE NEXT DAY, on a Thinkpad T530 and I couldn't b…

I used to think every one of my friends with a MBP was a fisher price-loving brainless slave to Steve Jobs. Then I actually had to use one for work. I'll never go back. It's the little things that are not so little: 1) The wake speed 2) The battery life 3) The overall comfort and feel of the keys and the trackpad compared to ANYTHING I've ever used before from Lenovo or Dell. I can live in Mac mode and build almost a…

  > And if I need to do anything for Windows, I just use Boot Camp.
In my head I imagine 90% of Mac users that use Boot Camp just need it to play PC games. :) Then again, I suppose there's still really specific obscure software out there that is Windows only (or Win/IIS devs that prefer Mac hardware). Which reminds me, I wonder if I'll ever see 3ds Max on MacOS.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#444
post #48
post #24

OK, if they are so committed, where is OpenGL 4.5 and Vulkan support? Why is Safari so behind that it's now called "the new IE"? Talk is cheap, let them actually do something.

They wont support Vulkan since they have Metal.

While some big developers might find it worth the investment to use metal, most of us won't. When you're already invested in OpenGL and you're a cross-platform developer, Metal is not even open for consideration. Vulkan maybe, once it's more established.

What I would really benefit from is updated OpenGL support. Right now, MacOS X is the lowest common denominator, with all the other platforms having 4.5+ as standard. I can upgrade to that with ease. But I'm never going to be able to justify rewriting the stuff with Metal, because it would mean a complete parallel implementation just for MacOS, since we would need to retain OpenGL everywhere else.

Vendor-specific graphics APIs are, for the most part, a legacy of the past which we were lucky to escape from. Apple creating Metal is an anachronism, and I don't think it will have a long life unless they make it portable.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was not the pro users who made Apple rich. It was the consumers buying iPods, and later iPhones. Pro users are at the same time extremely demanding and extremely conservative. Apple has never done much to cater to that market, and the fact that they have so many pro users these days is a happy accident which has more to do with how awful these people used to be treated when they were Windows users, and not a lot t…

I said that pro users made them rich, I didn't say that they had done it by buying stuff. Apple has been reaping rewards from the pro market for years. It's been those pro users who have been advocating the platform among friends and family. It's been those pro users who have been the perfect subject for those marketing campaigns showing how awesome new products are. It's been those pro users who write tech blogs and…

If you believe pro users have that kind of clout, you are delusional. The iPod most certainly didn't succeed because it was endorsed by pro users, nor did the iPhone. In fact the reaction from the pro market to those products when they were introduced, was one of dismissal ('No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame'). These products succeeded on their own merits by being fantastic products and -- to a lesser extend -- on the strength of Apple's brand and marketing. The halo effect from these two products is largely responsible for the success the Mac has enjoyed in recent history.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#446

I think this "assurance" pretty much confirms for me that Apple has internally begun to shift even more resources away from the Mac and the Macbook. The very weak nature of the response which really does not provide any specifics what-so-ever is very typical when the underlying reality matches the rumor but the guy in charge just can't say it yet. Tim Cook is Apple's Ballamer - An ops. guy, great for the bottom line…

I think you're are a bit unfair to Ballmer, recently he admitted that they were late to the game but he was pushing for hardware and was not supported by the board[1]. Not everything MS is doing is becaus Ballmer is gone but also because Ballmer prepared Microsoft for it. [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-04/steve-bal...

> everything MS is doing is becaus Ballmer is gone but also because Ballmer prepared Microsoft for it.

There is very little evidence for this. An argument can be made for laying the ground work for Azure, but Ballmer had nothing to do with MS's recent efforts in open source and other exciting newer initiatives in the company.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#447

Personally, luxury laptop lines don't make sense for me at this point. There was a time when it was the only way to get decent hardware, but those days are long gone. Four years ago I spilled water on my 2009 17" MBP (RIP) and Apple wanted $1200 for the repair. Instead, I spent ~$1300, including three-year accident-protection insurance where they show up at your house THE NEXT DAY, on a Thinkpad T530 and I couldn't b…

> Yeah, it's not thin and weighs 1.5 pounds more than a 15" MBP. It also doesn't run OS X, and lots of other stuff. If you try to understand it as "value for money", then there are far better computers for number crunching that are way cheaper than a Mac. Instead with Mac you get lots of marginal returns, that, if you have the money can appreciate, and they are all focused on things other than raw performance per dol…

I've never had a stuck pixel on any of the macs I've had but my iPhone 7 has 2 pixels stuck on. If like to see if Apple will fix/replace even though it is nearly unnoticeable unless looking at pure black with the brightness high.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#448
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sun Ray was pretty nice, but I want the opposite. I carry a ok processor, storage, and some memory that can hook to a dock which gives me more processing, storage, and memory. I get the feeling we need to look back to things like Newton Soups for the storage and then applying those concepts to the others.

I guess you want something akin to what Razer Core is for Razer Blade, but then you don't want more graphics power. Apparently it uses USB-C to achieve this. Does that give confidence we may see this feature more commonly?

I consider the current group of GPUs to be more processing power, but yes, something like what USB-C is supposed to offer. I would expect it will need to go beyond the use external memory and CPU.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#449
post #439

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My metaphor is leaking! My point is that I would be quite happy to buy a $3000 machine if it were stelar quality, and I could rely on it for the next five years. Some people will always pay top dollar for pro gear. If you use and rely on a piece of equipment enough, it's worth it.

> My point is that I would be quite happy to buy a $3000 machine if it were stelar quality, and I could rely on it for the next five years. Well if that's what you're into... http://www.razerzone.com/gaming-systems/razer-blade-pro One downside is that the battery life is crap (5 hours or so)...and the base price is $3600.

If it's as durable and upgradable as its price, I might go for it. The other issue for me is OS, but if I address that I'm veering off topic.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#450
post #393
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$400 for dongles? Got a breakdown on that?

Not the original poster but I'll have a go... 1. OWC Thunderbolt 3 dock so I can connect my existing monitor and wired network (not yet available): $279. 2. Replacement for my USB-A Superdrive: $39.99 3. Thunderbolt 3 hdmi media kit for presentations: $49 4. USB-C SD card reader: $29 5. USB-C to Lightning cable: $20 6. USB-C to USB-A dongle so I can connect my ANT+ dongle: $9 7. Power supply extension cable (you don'…

It's also worth noting that the OWC dock is not official hardware and so may not behave quite as smoothly as the Thunderbolts (currently) do.
Post reply on HN