Live data from Hacker News

Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

techcrunch.com

351–360 of 623 posts

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Take a look at reddit.com/r/unixporn

C'mon now, don't be lazy, add that http:// to the front to create a link: http://reddit.com/r/unixporn/

> C'mon now, don't be lazy, add that http:// to the front to create a link:

C'mon now, don't be lazy, add that s to the end of http to create a link:

https://reddit.com/r/unixporn/

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#352
post #313
post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

how do you get vim keybinds in every app?

Also curious!

(dupe of other comment in same thread by me)

For OS X at least...

https://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jrus/site/cocoa-text.html

If you haven't yet tweaked these "not well-advertised" settings, this may indeed turn out to be a "this changes everything!" moment for you

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#353
post #316

It's actually kind of amazing to see the discourse shift against Apple and the new MacBook Pro to the point where it seems almost self-reinforcing. Like someone turned the reality distortion field on backwards or something. I've been wanting a mac laptop the size and weight of a MacBook Air 13" but with a retina display for years, and the ability to connect usb, power and external display with just a single cable is…

It's easy to explain. Price. I've been wanting a mac laptop the size and weight of a MacBook Air 13" ... how about the size and weight and price?? They removed a bunch of ports, reduced battery life and upped the price. USD $1799 to $2799 (with touch bar). Pricing is out of reach. Especially if you live outside of the USA where exchange rate kills it completely. I love the 13" Macbook Air, just wish they would add re…

They’re way too expensive, graphic cards are weak, maximum RAM configuration isn’t high enough, and they’re clearly not designed for pros.

Reddit thread from 4 years ago (curtesy of Gruber): https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/1244m4/apples_13_mac...

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#354
post #50
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They wont support Vulkan since they have Metal.

Eventually they might. Or at least if they'll be relevant at that time.

No need when Unreal, Unity, Crytek and every other game engine that matters already support Metal.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Had the same thing. Turns out, I'm more of a design snob then I thought I was. Trying to move away from macOS and trying out Windows and a few Linux distro's, my god it's all ugly. I don't care much about Apple hardware specifically, but they got my hooked because of the OS. Pretty lame.

Funny I'm the exact opposite. Only on a MBPr for the hardware, otherwise would prefer Linux to OSX. Lightweight tiling window manager + Vim keybinds for all apps = super efficient. With OSX I actually have to use the mouse. How quaint.

Customizing the Cocoa Text System (which in turn pretty much affects all apps with text input)

https://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jrus/site/cocoa-text.html

This enables you to do what you're referring to in MacOS.

If you haven't yet tweaked these "not well-advertised" settings, this may indeed turn out to be a "this changes everything!" moment for you

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#356
post #238
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they spend a whole lot of energy on the iWatch and it didn't pan out the way they hoped.

That and the iPad Pro were real duds. Good concepts, underwhelming execution ("let's just slap iOS on a big-ass screen, it will do").

> the iPad Pro were real duds

Huh really? First I've heard of it.

iPad sales volume continue to drop yet price remains stable.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#357
post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a Zenbook. Windows for development isn't nearly as convinent as OSX. Yes there's lots of customization you can do to make it bearable. Powershell isn't as awful as CMD, but projects aren't supporting Powershell as much as bash any time this decade AFAIK. The Linux subsystem works, but the flow between Windows and Linux is lacking. I tried Linux. Linux doesn't handle my mix of high DPI and normal DPI monitors (…

Problem is that each software upgrade from Apple contains important security and reliability fixes. You get those even on old Mac hardware (my MBP is 6 years old now). On a Hackintosh, you don't know whether those software upgrades are going to work, or if they will break or brick your system. On top of that, when I looked around, I couldn't find some kind of good guide advising me which ultrabook to buy as Hackintos…

I didn't get the Zenbook ever dreaming I'd Hackintosh it, it was more a move of desperation than anything.

And I definitely wouldn't recommend buying a laptop just to Hackintosh it, its more of a fun hack than anything with a few specific exceptions where there's strong overlap between an Apple product and an existing PCs hardware (and at that point you might as well just buy the official product if you're only going to Hackintosh it, bar cost)

I'd have just gotten another MBP if I wanted OS X for the start for the reasons you list (and the fact that while in many areas OSX was handling the hardware better, it still didn't support the stock wifi or the Optimus setup).

I think the MBP issues are overblown. The 2015 is still around and still fully capable. I find it strange that people are complaining about the 2016, but then comparing it to laptops that were out for months, and in some cases years, when the 2015 was out, but weren't being chosen over the 2015 by the same users.

There's some backlash because people wanted a MBP refresh and it isn't want they wanted, but I don't see OSX losing that much developer mindshare in the long term. I don't agree with the fear lingering about it being the "end of days" for "Pro MBPs", I think this MBP was an interesting experiment that came at a very poor time (when people were already anxious for a progression of the MBP 2015-2011 in a new form factor, with a bigger battery most likely)

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#358

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm also considering a switch, but Windows drives me up the wall whenever I touch it. macOS has been getting uglier and more awkward to use the last few years, but Windows is still the king of ugly. So I've been considering Linux as my first option. I fired up a few VMs and dipped my toes in various Linux desktop environments: Elementary, Fedora 25, and Ubuntu (Unity) so far. These are all GNOME 3 variants. And... oh…

I am experiencing the same thing, but on the reverse side. At my home, I have a Ubuntu desktop which works perfectly. I use Eclipse, Android Studio and Atom editor. On work, I use MBP and pretty much the same environment. I know it is not a common opinion but no matter what I do, I still like Ubuntu more than macos. I agree that macos looks more polished, engineered and complete but somehow, I prefer Ubuntu's plastic…

MacOS lost me somewhere around Mavericks and the idea of a tablet that is also my PC was appealing, so I tried a Surface Pro 3 and decided to keep it. Ubuntu Bash for Windows is great, but is Beta and still needs some work. As for my old 2011 MBP, Ubuntu runs very well on it. For a couple of decades I kept trying Linux on the desktop, and today I am happy with it. From managing photos, CAD for my 3D printer, Python development and music with my keyboard, Dropbox support, it really is remarkable how far the desktop has come. I am still using the web client for OneNote though...

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#359
post #24

OK, if they are so committed, where is OpenGL 4.5 and Vulkan support? Why is Safari so behind that it's now called "the new IE"? Talk is cheap, let them actually do something.

> Why is Safari so behind that it's now called "the new IE"?

As an actual developer, who's been around since the eternal IE-version days, I really don't understand this criticism.

Honestly, Safari as a lot of new really nice browsers features that my clients are actually asking for, like blurred backgrounds[1] and native CSS carousels[2]. Realistically, things like WebRTC is only holding back a very specific subset of development.

[1]: http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-backdrop-filter

[2]: http://caniuse.com/#feat=css-snappoints

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#360
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which roots? The System 8 and 9 days, when my Mac would freeze on me every day? Throughout its history, Apple has had its ups and downs when it comes to quality on the desktop. There have been high points (System 7, OS 10.4 or so?) and low points, just as Microsoft have had their Windows 2000 and (shudder) Windows Me. There are no "roots", there are only local minima and maxima.

Wtf, Win 2000 was boss. It took the desktop in the XXI century with the NT kernel. Sure, it had some security issues, but it was the best desktop ever at the time, and a real revolution.

I'm pretty sure that mikesickler mentioned Win2000 as an example of Microsoft's "high point"…
Post reply on HN