Live data from Hacker News

Building Jarvis

facebook.com

221–230 of 263 posts

Re: Building Jarvis

#221
I'm viewing the article without logging into Facebook. In the comment / response section where "X, Y, Z, and a billion others liked this", the first person is 'Priscilla Chan', which I'm guessing is the same person that is Mark's wife.

I'm curious, is that priority computed based on Mark's circle of friends? Or, are these values hard-coded / special-cased for the CEO, and potentially other individuals aswell?

Re: Building Jarvis

#222
My issue with this is calling it 'Jarvis'. Jarvis increased Stark's ability to build new, cool things. That's interesting. Something along these lines--also inspired by Jarvis--is something that interests me greatly. Regardless of implementation, the end goal of this project is boring in comparison to Jarvis' actual purpose.

Re: Building Jarvis

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

sigh this is why I don't usually get involved in arguments about whether something is considered AI or not; it just devolves into people trying to define and redefine what the word 'AI' even means. Final word: I follow this stuff closely and read the research articles, and what we currently have is really great, but it's still just pulling the wool over your eyes. These techniques and algorithms trick you into thinki…

To be fair, I fool people into thinking I'm intelligent all the time.

Superintelligence will be achieved by: a) Training a system to trick the smartest people on the planet that it's smart, and then b) Asking it to prove itself by solving the Riemann hypothesis.

Re: Building Jarvis

#224
post #212

"For assistants like Jarvis to be able to control everything in homes for more people, we need more devices to be connected and the industry needs to develop common APIs and standards for the devices to talk to each other." This.

Like the industry developed standards and common APIs for people to send text to each other :)

Re: Building Jarvis

#225
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey, I also work my ass off to the point of getting sick and I have accomplished nothing. By that I mean I have not made any money. I've listed some of my projects here and not even a single up vote. I don't like it but it is what it is. I'm simply trying to say that I'm no less ambitious, and that is probably true of a lot of us here. The gods of luck have simply not been on my side, yet.

It's very true that how hard you work doesn't correlate directly with success. That said, learning how to work hard is one of the best things you can do to become successful. Once you master that, you then have to learn from each experience. If some of the things you're doing haven't worked out, try to examine them and figure out where you went wrong. Feel free to post some here for others to chime in. Also, don't ne…

I just want to point out that the upvoted by friends part is against Hacker News policy and not encouraged and I personally consider them as very unethical:

> Can I ask people to upvote my submission?

> No. Users should vote for a story because it's intellectually interesting, not because someone is promoting it.

> When the software detects a voting ring, it penalizes the post. Accounts that vote like this eventually get their votes ignored.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html

Re: Building Jarvis

#226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This would never be secure enough for a normal persons house The Canadians beg to differ ;)

Could you explain your comment for us? I'd guess that maybe Canadians are known for leaving their homes unlocked??

This is a reference to a scene from the Michael Moore movie Bowling for Columbine, where he is walking in a Canadian neighborhood and just opens the front door of someone's house. I couldn't find a better clip than this one: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pjJbtb4Bs0Q

Re: Building Jarvis

#227

I built something to similar this, using a Raspberry Pi, reverse SSH tunnels, Phillips Hue, Nest, and a range of sensors. Part of the project was an admin panel, to oversee the status/health of all the systems, as well as a manual control panel. My biggest concern was security. Granted, it was an internal network in my house, but if anyone got access to it, they had camera feeds, and practically full control of my ho…

So did we. Rasberry pi, spotify, facial recognition (using cmu open face) and a couple of other components...http://blog.algorithmia.com/hey-zuck-we-built-your-facial-re...

Re: Building Jarvis

#228
"No commercial products I know of do this today, and this seems like a big opportunity."

sound of a million pitches being thrown together

Re: Building Jarvis

#229
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet 30 years we could do all that with a whole lot of if statements. It would just return false positives a lot more. A couple of others have replied saying the same thing as you that this is 'AI', but it's not. As soon as you try to use it for something it wasn't programmed for, it fails. It doesn't even understand what it is doing right now. This isn't me 'moving the goalposts' either, we have literally never a…

You couldn't do face or voice recognition 30 years ago with if statements.

Theoretically you could, but as you were actually limited by hardware (camera resolution, CPU, etc...) anyway nobody really tried.

Re: Building Jarvis

#230

Say what you will about Zuckerberg, but this is a really cool project! Steps he took: 1. Connect his home devices (lights, thermostat, doors, music player, TV, CCTV etc) to his computer, so he can turn them on and off from it and in general automate his house from his PC. 2. Add an NLP component to his computer, so he could text instructions to it and it would apply the correct automation task. This can learn prefere…

I was pleasantly surprised that it was actually written by Zuck. Good on him that he is still doing something he enjoys - coding.

(And world domination. The next step for the AI, obviously)

Post reply on HN