Live data from Hacker News

Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

arstechnica.co.uk

31–40 of 73 posts

Re: Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

#31

The AssociatesMind article[0] on this is much better than the ArsTechnica link, and goes into detail in the legal dimension of this question. In this case, Kurt's situation likely constitutes assault; and this would also likely be considered assault even if you believe that Eichenwald lied about having a seizure, as I've seen some people question. Here's the conclusion of that article: "Just as someone can be held li…

I hadn't heard of a spring-gun before. Basically this is a booby trap with a gun that shoots unattended when triggers.

Re: Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

#33
post #8

Twitter has a prominent checkbox in the setting allowing you to turn off autoplaying of videos and GIFs. Given that most are not epileptic, and that Eichenwald is, he should have had the mindfulness to check whether the platform could be adapted to his needs.

From his writing about this in Newsweek [0]:

> I was carrying my iPad, looking at the still image on the video and, without thinking, touched the PLAY button.

Sounds like autoplay was already turned off.

[0] http://www.newsweek.com/epileptogenic-pepe-video-507417

Re: Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

#34

So precautions for preventing a death for a health condition you have are supposed to be put on everyone else? No one forced him to watch the gif. If anything it's twitters fault for autoplaying the images.

So much stupidity here. If Twitter are responsible for autoplaying then the sender is more responsible because they sent it. But seriously can't you see that the sender knew that it could cause the receiver harm, their tweet stated that was their intent, it caused harm, they are therefore responsible for that outcome. Imagine I flew a drone into someone and they were hurt by it. I knew flying the drone I to them woul…

I think this person doesn't understand personal accountability.

Re: Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

#36
Precedent for this is the attack on Epilepsy Foundation website:

https://archive.wired.com/politics/security/news/2008/03/epi...

I'd support criminal charges for attackers who do this. It's just a digital way of causing physical damage. The federal government is already all over this stuff in terms of things like SCADA attacks. The FBI would be sympathetic to the case given that plus hating hackers in general.

Re: Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

#37
For those here who don't understand why a lot of the internet doesn't care about this kind of thing (or sometimes tries to shows disdain in an immature way by trolling), here are the nuances.

In America, usually freedom of speech is the basic law of what can be said. That means that I can say what I want to you, even if it's hurtful, even if I do it TO hurt you, no matter what. Message is message. The reason this works so well from a legal perspective is because trying to put law around what can be said becomes so murky and ripe for abuse.

However, the fact is, words often can hurt more than physical violence. So instead we have norms around what messages are appropriate. Certain words are "off limits" in most settings "Nigger, Cunt, Retard" and people will socially shun you if you use them with negative intent. However, again, this becomes murky and ripe for abuse, think of those who keep playing the "you're a racist" card as a political tactic. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_about_the_word_%...)

So those people who have been the victim of politics (you used a gender-specific pronoun, now I will shun you, but I'm really doing it because I don't like you and want to hurt you but have a convenient social excuse to ostracize you and look like the good guy for doing it) often overreact and take out their anger anonymously online.

I bring this up because. I think once both groups understand each other, this entire quarrel will start to subside. Those who don't even try to understand the other side I can only assume want the quarrel to continue.

Re: Malicious tweet gives journalist Kurt Eichenwald an epileptic seizure

#38
post #5

Wow, this is equivalent to sending someone a mail "bomb" that doesn't explode but electrocutes them severely. I hope the offender ends up with a reasonable length prison sentence. There's a clear line, and the intentional infliction of physical harm is well beyond it.

I don't think prison is a best solution for such thing. He will get out and might become only worse. Maybe a psychology professional will make him understand what he did and prevent him from doing it again instead of sticking him into a jail and complain in couple years when he did something more serious. Prison only make it worse in most cases
Post reply on HN