Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft’s Surface Hub is now apparently a billion-dollar business

arstechnica.com

11–20 of 190 posts

Re: Microsoft’s Surface Hub is now apparently a billion-dollar business

#11
post #2

Very impressive entrance into what I thought would have been a well mature market by this point.

Integration with Microsoft services is probably a good selling point .

Also known as 'lock-in' in some contexts.

Re: Microsoft’s Surface Hub is now apparently a billion-dollar business

#13
post #10
post #3

I'm surprised by this as well, but I wonder how many of them were bought as "trophy" purchases, put on display in the lobby and the CEO's office.

"The average Surface Hub customer is buying about 50 devices for each deployment...(and) One (unnamed) car manufacturer bought 1,500 of the thing" Sounds like people are actually rolling them out through all their conference rooms

That's quite an investment, hopefully the decision was made with some input from the engineering teams that, I would imagine, be making use of the seats. I've seen procurements of this scale go both ways in that regard.

Re: Microsoft’s Surface Hub is now apparently a billion-dollar business

#14
It doesn't surprise me that Microsoft is in this space, and that they're doing well. But who would have thought this was a billion dollar business? I figured that the conference room's tech begins to rapidly depreciate almost immediately after installation; but maybe this is something different.

Re: Microsoft’s Surface Hub is now apparently a billion-dollar business

#18
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Integration with Microsoft services is probably a good selling point .

Also known as 'lock-in' in some contexts.

Interestingly this "lock-in" argument is often used with respect to Microsoft, but not with respect to Apple...

Re: Microsoft’s Surface Hub is now apparently a billion-dollar business

#19
post #18
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also known as 'lock-in' in some contexts.

Interestingly this "lock-in" argument is often used with respect to Microsoft, but not with respect to Apple...

Be fair. I've seen the lock-in argument used all the time here in regards to Apple stuff, particularly in discussions of iOS, macOS, and the App store.
Post reply on HN