81–90 of 214 posts
And I was hoping that was referring to this hyper: http://hyper.rs/
While not quite ready for a 1.0.0, there has been some neat stuff going on in hyper: over the last week, the tokio branch added support for TLS, and from what I hear, is mostly waiting on tokio's initial release to be merged into master. Soon........
But, everybody has their own list of must-haves and deal-breakers. I'm sure hyper 1.0.0 does enough for a significant number of people out there. Congrats to the team.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Someone beat me to it, and it was promptly closed: https://github.com/zeit/hyper/issues/1121 EDIT: I wrongly stated that the issue was closed. Please see further downthread. I apologize.
That issue looks open to me, and there is no notice in it that it was ever closed. It does however have another issue made after it reporting the same thing and a collaborator closed that issue citing it being a dupe.
Erm... What is it? I've clicked through several pages and still don't know, aside from the fact that apparently it extends the command line in some way. But I might just be missing something.
It would be nice of the title of the HN post said this (Hyper 1.0 Released, A Terminal Emulator built using Web Technologies), but it's easy to figure out once you go to the home or github page.
I fault the OP for the poor title, not the project.
So let me get this straight. This is a mini-webserver written in Javascript running the terminal as a webapp in a mini-webbrowser, right? This makes sense why? On the other hand: My favorite iOS SSH/Mosh client seems to be built on top of this and it's awesome.
To be sure, JavaScript can sometimes be fairly terrible as the scope of projects grow. The advantage here is how easily rich (or even absurd) UI elements can be implemented across all platforms by using web technologies. It also makes it comparatively easy to create a platform that is highly customizable and pluggable.
OK, I just installed it on Windows. Right out of the box, it does not recognize ctrl+c. What am I supposed to think about the quality of this? (I literally have not tried a single other thing. I made a typo on the very first command I wanted to try. I tried ctrl+c to start over, and it did not recognize it.) EDIT I gave it another chance. If I start a bash shell, it recognizes ctrl+c, but it does not recognize the up…
My experience with the Zeit team is that they're very responsive and interactive via GitHub - I'd be surprised if the issue isn't fixed soon
OK, I just installed it on Windows. Right out of the box, it does not recognize ctrl+c. What am I supposed to think about the quality of this? (I literally have not tried a single other thing. I made a typo on the very first command I wanted to try. I tried ctrl+c to start over, and it did not recognize it.) EDIT I gave it another chance. If I start a bash shell, it recognizes ctrl+c, but it does not recognize the up…
I think the downvotes may be that you're posing a rhetorical question based on a sample size of one. As opposed to spending 15 more seconds to try a few more things and saying "I tried 10 commands, nothing worked" or "I tried 10 commands, works great, but Ctrl+C is broken on Windows and that really needs to be fixed" My experience with the Zeit team is that they're very responsive and interactive via GitHub - I'd be…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It makes sense because JavaScript has, through several bizarre turns of events, become the language du jour , which means all sort of clueless people are falling over themselves to abuse it in increasingly convoluted ways, so that the clueless people in corporate HR who've been told "We need someone who is a JavaScript rockstar!" can be wowed by the description of some nightmarish contraption that "really takes insan…
You know what's tiring? People getting out of their way to gratuitously criticize the collective effort of a coordinated group of passionate people who just want to have fun reinventing the wheel.