Live data from Hacker News

On Getting Older in Tech

corgibytes.com

321–330 of 440 posts

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#321

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dude. Open source software.

Even jQuery which is one of the most famous open source projects will be forgotten in 10 years or even less.

Nope, it'll live on and the code will be available for all to see and study which means it'll end up being a case study or research material in a textbook or Masters or Phd thesis.

One day someone may try to make an emulator for IE5 and ES4 just to run jQuery (like we've seen done with the 6502 and C64).

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#322
post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even jQuery which is one of the most famous open source projects will be forgotten in 10 years or even less.

I disagree. Software with that level of popularity doesn't disappear.

Yeah, let's just boot up netscape navigator, aol, and lotus notes

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's kind of you Dan. Yep -- I remind myself that ageism is the one form of discrimination that eventually affects everyone. There might be more...I dunno, but it keeps me on mission. I run a Medium publication at https://blog.oldgeekjobs.com . If you've got writing chops, I'm looking for contributors. That goes for anybody. Thanks again.

What kind of contributions are you looking for?

Blog posts that can make the front page of HN and/or Reddit. Let me know if you're interested in collaborating

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#324
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorting algorithm you serious? No one uses that in his carreer.

You need them for those whiteboarding tech interviews.

I misread that as "waterboarding tech interviews", and I thought it was commentary on how whiteboard interviews feel like torture.

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#325
post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even jQuery which is one of the most famous open source projects will be forgotten in 10 years or even less.

I disagree. Software with that level of popularity doesn't disappear.

"Unsurprisingly I now use React for most of my coding instead." - John Resig, creator of jQuery

https://twitter.com/jeresig/status/726058698989277185

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#326

48 yo here, started coding when I was 14, so that's 34 years of building things. Here's where I'm at. I look back at my career and I can tell you about great projects that I got to be part of, awards and plaudits that I won, big paybacks from projects that went well and literally saved the company. That's all nice to have war stories. But I can't point to any of it and say, "I made that" because - and here's the kick…

Why are you concerned about longevity of your creations? Surely impact matters more than the time they exist? Your software might only last a few years, but it it's used thousands of times, that changes the world more than another record heard a few times per year but lasts decades.

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#327

48 yo here, started coding when I was 14, so that's 34 years of building things. Here's where I'm at. I look back at my career and I can tell you about great projects that I got to be part of, awards and plaudits that I won, big paybacks from projects that went well and literally saved the company. That's all nice to have war stories. But I can't point to any of it and say, "I made that" because - and here's the kick…

Impermanence. Everything goes away. As software developers we often just get to see the whole lifespan of a project more often. Not many other professions get the privilege of building something from nothing, watching it grow and change, then get to slowly pull it down and retire it.

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#328
post #320

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even jQuery which is one of the most famous open source projects will be forgotten in 10 years or even less.

I disagree. Software with that level of popularity doesn't disappear.

Heck, even software with the equivalent level of unpopularity (PHP) doesn't disappear.

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#329
post #104

I don't find this post inspiring, I find it sad. It's partly self-encouragment, part PR. The fact that it even exists is proof that the author is facing some issues, no matter how confident they would like to appear. That recipe to stay current looks tiresome. Listen to two podcasts, two webcasts, subscribe to four magazines, teach courses, go to one conference per year, blog regularly, read blogs, follow the latest…

> That recipe to stay current looks tiresome. ... Your reward: you are still employable.

It does make pursuing a career in programming seem dubious, doesn't it? There's an old saying about "clawing your way to the top", but sometimes it feels like I'm clawing my way back to where I started. I feel like I'm expected to have instant answers to any question and immediately comprehend any technology (regardless of its level of documentation or comprehensibility). I actually do enjoy learning about new things (and old things!), but most of the time, we're not paid to learn, we're paid to instantly know, and if you don't instantly know, there are 20 guys lined up around the block who are ready to take your place as soon as you admit that you don't know how to set up pass-through SSL using the undocumented firewall product that was installed last week that you don't have credentials for and we don't have time for you to waste reading documentation because there's a customer deadline and there's no slack in the schedule. The only other career I can think of that you have to put this much ongoing personal effort into is entertainment; it's like we have all the downsides of entertainment careers without any of the upsides.

On the other hand, I can't imagine doing anything else - every other job (except maybe astronaut) looks murderously boring to me.

Re: On Getting Older in Tech

#330

Younger people are not smarter. They might learn faster new things. On the other hand, older people understand related new things much better as they already have a large context (experience). The biggest difference of my current self (44) to my younger self is that I did spend much more energy in my projects when I was younger. I created results much faster at the cost of limited consideration. Now, I can still burn…

> Younger people are not smarter. They might learn faster new things.

I was a young person once (no, seriously!). I _thought_ I was learning things fast back then. When I got older, I realized I was trading speed for depth.

Post reply on HN