Earlier quoted context omitted.
You have no evidence for that, and it's a pretty horrible thing to say about the people who take those courses.
What's horrible about that? People doing things for the money is the driving force behind capitalism, the best economic system yet invented. It improves everybody's quality of life. I have no objection to people going to coding boot camps because they think it will help them make money, and I hope they succeed. But I don't think coding boot camps are evidence for great love for coding for its own sake. People who rea…
Why I Believe Scratch Is the Future of Programming
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: Why I Believe Scratch Is the Future of Programming
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you mean by "opportunity"? If you were unfortunate enough to attend a school that didn't have any sort of computing classes, after school groups, etc, or you lived somewhere rural that didn't have those programmes outside of school then you would have had no access to a mentor who can guide you. If they have 3 months to go to a camp, surely they could as well learn at home for those 3 months. In order to lear…
> If you were unfortunate enough to attend a school that didn't have any sort of computing classes, after school groups, etc, or you lived somewhere rural that didn't have those programmes outside of school then you would have had no access to a mentor who can guide you. I grew up in a small Greek village at a time when very few people knew what a computer was. My first exposure to programming was finding a CD with a…
I would be very surprised if you honestly can't conceive of people who would struggle immensely to teach themselves the way you did. Or even if they could succeed in doing so, that it might take too long or be too financially risky.
I personally know plenty of people like that. Some of them are very intelligent as well.
Re: Why I Believe Scratch Is the Future of Programming
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you were unfortunate enough to attend a school that didn't have any sort of computing classes, after school groups, etc, or you lived somewhere rural that didn't have those programmes outside of school then you would have had no access to a mentor who can guide you. I grew up in a small Greek village at a time when very few people knew what a computer was. My first exposure to programming was finding a CD with a…
Be careful when projecting your experiences onto others. I would be very surprised if you honestly can't conceive of people who would struggle immensely to teach themselves the way you did. Or even if they could succeed in doing so, that it might take too long or be too financially risky. I personally know plenty of people like that. Some of them are very intelligent as well.
Re: Why I Believe Scratch Is the Future of Programming
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
That plus the word 'believe' in the title. If i simply had to accept what others believe as to be the truth...
Huh? That's kind of an unfair criticism. The word "believe" is more or less an explicit expression from the author that the article is, well, his belief. As a programmer, I like explicit declaration when reading someone else's "code". The fault is more with you, for automatically associating the phrase "I believe" with implicit brainwashing.
believe bɪˈliːv/ verb 1. accept that (something) is true, especially without proof.
Re: Why I Believe Scratch Is the Future of Programming
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Arguing that people who don't already code shouldn't code assumes people make perfectly informed career choices based on their pre-determined personal traits. I strongly recommend reading Dweck's work on mindsets to dissuade you of the belief that aptitude for things like Mathematics is a fixed trait rather than something that can be changed. I think it's also helpful to recognise that the group that are exposed to p…
> Arguing that people who don't already code shouldn't code I'm sorry, I'm having hard time finding where I said that. Please do point me to an excerpt.
Cool. This (below) was the bit I must have misunderstood. It read as if you were saying that coders naturally find coding, and that people who don't naturally find coding are better off not coding.
"People who will code will code even if you don't push them to. And most others, well they have other better things to do in their lives like making art, becoming a scientist, or becoming a doctor."