Live data from Hacker News

Relocating from San Francisco to Seattle: cost comparison

wolframalpha.com

11–20 of 76 posts

Re: Relocating from San Francisco to Seattle: cost comparison

#11
OK, Wolfram Alpha kicks ass.

Here's the most interesting part:

| San Francisco, California | Seattle, Washington total sales tax rate | 9.5% | 9.5%

When people from California tell me it must be nice to live in a state like Washington, that doesn't have a state income tax, I like to torture them by pointing out that the lack of a state income tax is made up for by a high sales tax. Then they ask what the sales tax is, and I tell them.

Re: Relocating from San Francisco to Seattle: cost comparison

#12
The vast majority of the difference in that particular comparison is housing- which must apply to buying houses, because comparing rents certainly doesn't give 45% difference. So... this data is meaningless unless you own your house here and plan on buying there, from what I can tell, which probably excludes most of us.

Edit: OK, I'm finding some cheaper rents, but I think my main analysis stands.

Re: Relocating from San Francisco to Seattle: cost comparison

#15
post #11

OK, Wolfram Alpha kicks ass. Here's the most interesting part: | San Francisco, California | Seattle, Washington total sales tax rate | 9.5% | 9.5% When people from California tell me it must be nice to live in a state like Washington, that doesn't have a state income tax, I like to torture them by pointing out that the lack of a state income tax is made up for by a high sales tax. Then they ask what the sales tax is…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the_United_State...

"At 8.25%, California has the highest state sales tax, which can total up to 10.75% with local sales tax included."

"Washington has a 6.5% statewide sales tax."

What am I missing???

Re: Relocating from San Francisco to Seattle: cost comparison

#16
post #12

The vast majority of the difference in that particular comparison is housing- which must apply to buying houses, because comparing rents certainly doesn't give 45% difference. So... this data is meaningless unless you own your house here and plan on buying there, from what I can tell, which probably excludes most of us. Edit: OK, I'm finding some cheaper rents, but I think my main analysis stands.

There's also the fact that Washington has no state income tax; that's 10% in Seattle's favor that isn't even accounted for (I looked up ACCRA cost of living indices and they are after-tax).

Re: Relocating from San Francisco to Seattle: cost comparison

#17
post #15
post #11

OK, Wolfram Alpha kicks ass. Here's the most interesting part: | San Francisco, California | Seattle, Washington total sales tax rate | 9.5% | 9.5% When people from California tell me it must be nice to live in a state like Washington, that doesn't have a state income tax, I like to torture them by pointing out that the lack of a state income tax is made up for by a high sales tax. Then they ask what the sales tax is…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sales_taxes_in_the_United_State... "At 8.25%, California has the highest state sales tax, which can total up to 10.75% with local sales tax included." "Washington has a 6.5% statewide sales tax." What am I missing???

King County also levies a sales tax.
Post reply on HN