Coming soon to a jurisdiction near you!
Belarus finally bans Tor
31–40 of 127 posts
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#32I know very little of networking but I assume to perform a TCP reset injection attack, the ISP would need to rely on the IP address of the public onion routers. Now, why do they play around with the reset flag instead of just simply swallowing the packets directed at a tor router?
Kinda like the Berlin Wall. Easier to shoot people attempting to cross than hermetically seal the entire border.
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#33Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#34I know very little of networking but I assume to perform a TCP reset injection attack, the ISP would need to rely on the IP address of the public onion routers. Now, why do they play around with the reset flag instead of just simply swallowing the packets directed at a tor router?
Because effectively blocking packets at requires supervising all routes through which they might escape (i.e., managing a lot of dynamic rules on a lot of very critical routers), whereas injecting forged packets only requires one little box. Kinda like the Berlin Wall. Easier to shoot people attempting to cross than hermetically seal the entire border.
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#35Coming soon to a jurisdiction near you!
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#36Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#37Great read, especially the annotated version: http://fermatslibrary.com/s/examining-how-the-great-firewall...
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#38Wall Street Journal is actually praising Belarus: http://www.wsj.com/articles/belarus-is-emerging-as-the-silic...
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#39Could they use remote relays still?
Re: Belarus finally bans Tor
#40Wall Street Journal is actually praising Belarus: http://www.wsj.com/articles/belarus-is-emerging-as-the-silic...
When I read your comment it made it seem like the WSJ was praising Belarus for banning Tor, which is not the case. (at least from reading the portion of the article that is not behind a paywall)