Use Signal and give them access to all your contacts who may or may not be using Signal. Use their proprietary client and trust them on their pinky promise that they "can't" look at your messages. The deceptive pretense of privacy is worse than no privacy at all. [Edit] - "Use their proprietary client and trust them on their pinky promise" was factually wrong. But, they still expect me to trust the signed binary they…
Everyone in the geek press said it's "end to end" encrypted! That must mean it's totally safe! I'm sure everyone is reading the source code and building their own clients all the time, yea? Didn't some uber hacker somewhere with a big beard say that he read all the code and it's totally fucking solid and government proof?
Surely you don't mistrust all that do you... I mean... Your seem a bit dubious. You can't be trying to say that there are people out there who are actually not buying this horseshit, that are genuinely withholding trust in these sort of 'services'?
Blasphemy! You think that there are people out there, with a basic grasp of security and cynicism, might feel offended and depressed at how easy it's been to dupe everyone like this.. Again?
Nah. I'm sure we're all totally sold on signal. Seems legit.
I mean, since all the users of such a service have pretty much zero control/visability over the code that's actually running even on their own devices which is talking to this 'service', let alone what's going on on the servers (in some N.American datacentre, probably super secure...) might raise a few eyebrows, but it doesn't really change the fact that we're talking abiut END TO END encryption that someone said was totally 'secure'. And even the media have pushed a few stories about how evil criminals are using it to evade monitoring..
No, I'm not sure I'm on your side. This is clearly totally secure and no one could possibly abuse this kind of thing..
Right?.... Right?
starts crying and loads the rifle