Live data from Hacker News

Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator

indiehackers.com

341–343 of 343 posts

Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator

#341
I'm not sure if this is a scam. I went through the process and paid and I should get a logo in 30 minutes, but I've been waiting for 12+ hours and still no logo. I email the CEO, which the site says to email at dawson@logojoy.com, yet no response and no sign of a logo in my emails...hmm!

Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator

#342

Its refreshing to see a startup doing well and not feeling the need to force a subscription on people. I get that SaaS can be a good business model (great, even). On the other hand, I think subscription fatigue is real and you should think hard about your pricing. Dawson is making $15K/month on ONE TIME fees–and fees that are lower than a lot of monthly SaaS plans. I want to see more of this.

Thanks! Yeah, it's a little unnverving not knowing if you'll make any money tomorrow, but it's a simple model that fits the solution.

I've been trying to get my logo. My card was charged, but almost 24 hours and no logo...I emailed you like the page said but nothing...even sent a tweet...what's going on there?

Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator

#343
post #286

If you're still reading this: could you please allow + in the e-mail address? I understand why you want me to sign up, but I have no idea how much e-mail you're going to decide to send me, and sending it to a plus-address allows me to filter it on my terms. There's really no reason not to allow the + sign, unless you're going to do something nefarious with my e-mail address and you don't want me to know it was you.

How would plus-addressing prevent them doing something nefarious? I would think that if they're selling it, they could strip out anything post-plus in the process easily.

That is true. So the only reason for disallowing plus signs in addresses is ignorance, not malice.
Post reply on HN