Live data from Hacker News

Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

prerender.cloud

201–210 of 236 posts

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#201
post #42

Wow. My normal session now leaves me with around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously. Gmail is using less than 1GB again. I might even disable The Great Suspender, and stop killing tabs that use up lots of memory. Whoever worked on this, you deserve a raise. QOL improvements for so many people.

It is sad that I cant really tell if you are being sarcastic.

Sure memory is cheap vs. developer time, but still.

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would it work with USA zip codes? Zip codes are not universal...

Because it's programmed for US zip codes. So, you can't just enter any zip code in there. There would be clashes since zip codes aren't unique across countries.

For that use case there's the ISO standard for ZIP codes, as used in paper mail:

Short Country prefix (same as on international car ID plates), then a minus, then the ZIP code.

So, for Germany, D-24107 would be one such code.

Yet, it doesn't handle that either.

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#203
post #201
post #42

Wow. My normal session now leaves me with around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously. Gmail is using less than 1GB again. I might even disable The Great Suspender, and stop killing tabs that use up lots of memory. Whoever worked on this, you deserve a raise. QOL improvements for so many people.

It is sad that I cant really tell if you are being sarcastic. Sure memory is cheap vs. developer time, but still.

Cannot imagine him being sarcastic:

around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously.

1-2gb only left is something that greatly lowers the quality of developer time.

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah Ok I thought it might be an OS utility. Thanks for the tip. I also highly recommend session buddy for excessive tab folks. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/session-buddy/edac...

chrome already has this behavior built in, start where I left off under settings. Is this different?

[deleted]

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#205
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tabs are the new bookmarks.

They're better. If I bookmark something with any service, chances of me ever checking that out again drop to nearly zero. Tabs, by virtue of being there bugging you, are bookmarks, to-do lists, and task reminders all in one.

[deleted]

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, they aren't. I don't know about you, but I can't have more than 20 tabs open and consciously be aware of the content. I can't think of people like above, having 120 tabs. It's probably a waste of time and resources. First because you can't possibly hold in your memory 120 tabs, thus you'll have to visit them or read the title to remind you why is it there on the first place. With bookmarks at least you can use th…

Naw, at least with me I seem to be able to by treating the tab ordering as a conceptual discovery ordering. That is, I remember what things I learned / researched prior to and following each tab. It's lossy, but because each has a unique relationship with its surrounding concepts there's plenty of opportunities for parity-like behaviour; redundancy. When researching a thing I'll open up some high level page about it,…

[deleted]

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#207
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He has a point. For me, most of my 'web' experience isn't doing anything I don't remember doing in 1995. The things websites are doing I usually don't want them to do. I just want to see text, images, and video with light formatting and hyperlinks. This _doesn't_ require hundreds of megabytes of memory. It would involve restricting what the new web could do and those restrictions would make things better. We don't ne…

That's about the reasoning behind amp...

Didn't downvote you but I think you fell for the marketing.

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#208
post #166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Come on man, you don't want to be that guy at HN that rains on everyone's parade. A 30% decrease in RAM usage for an app as complex as Chrome is really something to be celebrated. Great work is done piece by piece.

Hacker News wouldn't be Hacker News if it wasn't full of assholes.

Feel free to tune your feelings.

To qualify as one in my book you have to be a serious problem: one came to give me a beating at work and the only way I got away was to find a corner and a weapon until he got distracted.

Another one made life at work so frustrating for two years that I left one of my best jobs ever just to never have to deal with that guy alone.

Unless someone here is stalking you, messing up you life etc then try something like this instead: there are a lot of people on HN who disagrees with me in ways I didn't expect.

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#209
post #42

Wow. My normal session now leaves me with around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously. Gmail is using less than 1GB again. I might even disable The Great Suspender, and stop killing tabs that use up lots of memory. Whoever worked on this, you deserve a raise. QOL improvements for so many people.

> Gmail is using less than 1GB again

Geez. If that's something we need to be happy about, we're doomed.

Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54

#210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, they aren't. I don't know about you, but I can't have more than 20 tabs open and consciously be aware of the content. I can't think of people like above, having 120 tabs. It's probably a waste of time and resources. First because you can't possibly hold in your memory 120 tabs, thus you'll have to visit them or read the title to remind you why is it there on the first place. With bookmarks at least you can use th…

Naw, at least with me I seem to be able to by treating the tab ordering as a conceptual discovery ordering. That is, I remember what things I learned / researched prior to and following each tab. It's lossy, but because each has a unique relationship with its surrounding concepts there's plenty of opportunities for parity-like behaviour; redundancy. When researching a thing I'll open up some high level page about it,…

You gave me an idea to a chrome plugin to manage tabs. I'm gonna open ne some tabs to learn how to write plugins.
Post reply on HN