awesome news then, chrome really needs to improve memory usage, especially when I have lots of tabs open. under firefox I normally had 120 tabs open all the time, and it's fine. with chrome, I dare not to exceed 60 tabs. chrome triggers heavy swap all the time still, which renders the system very sluggish.
Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
131–140 of 236 posts
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
Suspends tabs after a set period of disuse. Great for people who open a ton of tabs in Chrome.
But then you miss out on the new chance at life http://www.theonion.com/article/accidentally-closing-browser...
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#133Wow. My normal session now leaves me with around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously. Gmail is using less than 1GB again. I might even disable The Great Suspender, and stop killing tabs that use up lots of memory. Whoever worked on this, you deserve a raise. QOL improvements for so many people.
Are you using Classic Gmail or Google Inbox?
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
TO THE DEVELOPER, FWIW: I'm also in California and it thinks I'm in the Philippines in a town with the same name as one a few miles from here. I assume you use IP to find town, country; throw away country; look up town in a list with country names in alphabetical order (Philippines Note that even if you get the country right it won't be enough, because there is a "Springfield" in each of the 50 states. You'll have to…
As a workaround, you can use your zip code instead. E.g. http://wttr.in/90401
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
TO THE DEVELOPER, FWIW: I'm also in California and it thinks I'm in the Philippines in a town with the same name as one a few miles from here. I assume you use IP to find town, country; throw away country; look up town in a list with country names in alphabetical order (Philippines Note that even if you get the country right it won't be enough, because there is a "Springfield" in each of the 50 states. You'll have to…
> Note that even if you get the country right it won't be enough, because there is a "Springfield" in each of the 50 states. D'oh!
D'oh! (All these years.... How many other things do I "know" that aren't true...?)
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#136Wow. My normal session now leaves me with around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously. Gmail is using less than 1GB again. I might even disable The Great Suspender, and stop killing tabs that use up lots of memory. Whoever worked on this, you deserve a raise. QOL improvements for so many people.
On the other hand, it appears all extensions now have a >50MB memory usage floor. For example, the Authy extension was using 5MB under Chrome 54. It's now using 55MB on Chrome 55. Similarly the simple archive.is button extension went from 5MB to 55MB. That's a lot of RAM for spartan functionality.
For the record, I'm using the chrome://system/ page to compare before and after.
That said, it may be possible the additional memory usage for extensions may be a reporting change as opposed to an actual memory increase. Unsure either way.
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#137Nice... but why is it faster/memory is more important to me. I suppose I could look at the changelog but it would have been nice if the post guessed why.
http://v8project.blogspot.ca/2016/10/fall-cleaning-optimizin...
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
weather.com uses drupal7 + apache2 + ubuntu + angularjs, not sure why it is that slow, I use weather.com once a while just fine though.
It is only because of AngularJS + Ads. This is a slow down caused by browser rendering/parsing/JS execution. I'm not sure what the server operating system would have to do with it.
That AngularJS is a slow piece of ... is another part. I coded up a simple Twitter client using Cordova with Angular, scrapped and rebuilt it in jQuery with Cordova (was a test if one can actually build a backendless Twitter app). Such speed, many awesome.
I guess many of the "hipster" JS devs use the latest, max-spec macbook/iphone only and totally ignore the rest of ordinary PCs/average Android phone, or they wouldn't dare to touch Angular and friends even with a pole.
Source: operating a couple Drupal instances.
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#139Great news! A simple weather website, with about 1 MB worth of actual content (text, markup, images, layout) now only uses 250 MB of memory. And it only takes a few seconds to load on a 100Mbps+ connection whenever I click a menu item (that's with all ads and tracking blocked and most of the stuff already cached). I'm sorry, I just don't see any reason to celebrate.
I personally just do a Google search for 'weather' if I want local weather. Otherwise, 'weather '. Very fast and lightweight.
Re: Chrome 55 uses 30% less memory than 54
#140Wow. My normal session now leaves me with around 8gb free out of 16, compared to 1-2gb free previously. Gmail is using less than 1GB again. I might even disable The Great Suspender, and stop killing tabs that use up lots of memory. Whoever worked on this, you deserve a raise. QOL improvements for so many people.
For me the situation is perhaps not quite as clear cut. On the one hand I'm seeing nice improvements in the large memory hogging tabs. For example a typical reddit thread was reduced from 399 MB down to 295 MB. On the other hand, it appears all extensions now have a >50MB memory usage floor. For example, the Authy extension was using 5MB under Chrome 54. It's now using 55MB on Chrome 55. Similarly the simple archive.…
I'm using shift+esc task manager, and top to see overall system free ram.