Live data from Hacker News

The Cable-Cutting Dream Is Kind of a Myth

wsj.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: The Cable-Cutting Dream Is Kind of a Myth

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> At the same time, you, like many others, do have it hooked up to your TV, and you watch it at least occasionally. Despite the bundle being cheaper, you still are by all metrics a legit cable TV subscriber. I used to have the basic internet + TV package because it was $10 cheaper than the standalone internet option, and I literally never plugged in the TV equipment.

The reason cable is bundled as a discount is twofold: (1) you can get upsold later on a bigger and better package ("only $9.99 more!"), and (2) the bundle is a temporary/promotional rate -- after a fixed amount of time, long after you've forgotten about the fine print, your cable bill jumps up. Source: worked a summer during college for a cable company, trying to appease thousands of pissed off customers.

People always try and tell me that it was a promotional rate, but I had this rate for five years.

Re: The Cable-Cutting Dream Is Kind of a Myth

#52
This article entirely misses the point, and is out of touch with the reason people skip cable. Cost only marginally comes into it.

It comes down to this. Which would you rather spend your money on? Live TV which you have to use a DVR to watch at leisure, and even then you are limited to only that which is currently being aired; or on-demand streaming, where you can choose exactly what to watch, when to watch it, without filling up a DVR, skipping through commercials, etc.

Not only do I pay for Netflix, HBO Now, Starz, Showtime, and Amazon Prime. I also purchase season passes for shows I want on Amazon Video or Apple TV. I likely still pay less than I would for cable. I have no interest in live TV, and for the rare events I care about (such as the Super Bowl), those stream for free online. Even if I pay the same or slightly more, I don't care. It's not about the cost. It's about the freedom.

Post reply on HN