Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
211–220 of 343 posts
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#212Hey guys - Dawson here (founder) let me know if you have any questions about Logojoy / the story.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#213Hey guys - Dawson here (founder) let me know if you have any questions about Logojoy / the story.
What can you tell us about the algorithms you used or where did you start on learning A.I. ? Interesting approach for logo creation!
The last step isn’t actually AI – it’s a genetic algorithm. As you ‘favorite’ logos, we apply a natural selection type process to generate more accurate logos as you scroll. Each logo is made up of hundreds of ingredients (ie ‘funky font’, ‘bold color’, ‘logo has a symbol’, etc.) – these are called traits in the context of genetic algorithms.
As others in the thread have already mentioned, the AI referenced in the previous steps seems more like a rules-based algorithm.Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#214Earlier quoted context omitted.
What can you tell us about the algorithms you used or where did you start on learning A.I. ? Interesting approach for logo creation!
I don't know about Logojoy in particular, but every AI begins with some variation of rand(). :)
> Yeah, the ML is still in it's infancy... To address that, I built in some more randomness into the algorithm so the initial logo designs can just get the user thinking and then we can get a better sense of their taste as they favorite logos. Without that randomness, the algorithm tries and fails horribly at creating logos.
Some variation of rand() indeed!
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
You talk about the ML being reinforced over time by user actions so you must have suffered from the 'cold start' problem in the beginning. How did you address this? Did you initialize it with your own expert curated rules/weightings? Something else? Have you done any automated mining of the elements in existing "good" company logos (e.g. Nike, AirBnB, etc.). I could see doing something manual too like Music Genome Pr…
Yeah, the ML is still in it's infancy, so we're almost in that cold-start right now. To address that, I built in some more randomness into the algorithm so the initial logo designs can just get the user thinking and then we can get a better sense of their taste as they favorite logos. Without that randomness, the algorithm tries and fails horribly at creating logos. I would love to analyze 'good' logos. I would imagi…
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#216Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. I'm making 25k month with a SaaS that was built on boring ASP.NET+SQL Server+Angular 1 because that's what I knew. I host it on Windows because I know how to make it fast and secure. I'm happy I focused all my time on building the features that clients were asking for, instead of learning the latest frameworks or fighting an OS I'm not familiar with.
built on boring [...] Angular 1 Ah yes, the halcyon yesteryear of Angular 1.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#217Earlier quoted context omitted.
Somali Shillings
Doesn't it make sense to be specific with the currency you are talking about on an international forum? I realise the US is the worlds most powerful country with a very important currency, but it doesn't follow that we should always just assume that any currency spoken about is USD.
While this forum does have people from all over the world (I'm living in London), it also is a forum headquarted by a seed accelerator based in the US.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#218What struck me the most is going with the old and tried tools (PHP+MySQL). Nowadays everyone - myself included - is trying to have an excuse to try the sexiest JS framework of the day and most of us fail miserably to deliver anything useful - because of lack of experience or just reinventing the wheel altogether. Old and boring is still sometimes the best.
> Old and boring is still sometimes the best. It's not so much old vs new, or cool vs boring, but rather the thing you are most experienced with. If the goal is to just build the damn thing, go with a stack you would be most productive in.
This exactly. Customers do not care what the product was written in, as long as it solves their problem. I find this is a hard thing for programmers as we are generally curious and want to be learning. It is important to remember the goal. If the goal is the learn, then go learn. If it's to ship some software to start a business, then use the tools you know and ship something.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#219No joy for me.
Re: Logojoy: AI-powered logo creator
#220Hey guys - Dawson here (founder) let me know if you have any questions about Logojoy / the story.
You mention trying to compete with designers "on the same level", but this seems like a different space than design. I do logos for my clients and most of the work is helping them make choices about what they should do with their logo, not actually drawing it. Have you considered partnering with designers instead of seeing them as competitors?