Book link: https://www.amazon.com/Bull-Horns-Fighting-Street-Itself/dp/...
How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
11–20 of 159 posts
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#12I absolutely love Senator Warren. That being said, the notion that the stock price of Wells Fargo could be significantly impacted by this scheme (which is central to Ms. Warren's argument) is not well founded. Wells Fargo makes 86 billion in revenue per year. Even if 10 million accounts were made and each made a thousand dollars -- (incredibly generous) ... over the course of 5 years this accounts for 1 billion in re…
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#13I appreciate that Warren didn't let Stumpf talk his way out of taking any responsibility for the actions of his employees and made a clear argument as to why he should be held accountable. Unfortunately, it seems the primary reason he resigned was because the public outrage was loud enough. It seems that until CEOs are personally held accountable via fines or prison (as Warren suggests) we won't see a very big change…
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#14I absolutely love Senator Warren. That being said, the notion that the stock price of Wells Fargo could be significantly impacted by this scheme (which is central to Ms. Warren's argument) is not well founded. Wells Fargo makes 86 billion in revenue per year. Even if 10 million accounts were made and each made a thousand dollars -- (incredibly generous) ... over the course of 5 years this accounts for 1 billion in re…
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#15This is good. Articles like this however always seem to recall the subprime mortgage crisis, when "too big to fail" sheltered CEOs and banks from much fallout. I would like to express to Sen Warren, and others, that a more fragmented & transparent financial system is important-- but much less than the broadband & tech sector. Google has 1.6B[0] users of a total of 3.8[1] internet users. too big to fail is 42% of the…
[1] due to their own reckless behavior / Capitalism on the upside, Socialism on the downside.
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#16I absolutely love Senator Warren. That being said, the notion that the stock price of Wells Fargo could be significantly impacted by this scheme (which is central to Ms. Warren's argument) is not well founded. Wells Fargo makes 86 billion in revenue per year. Even if 10 million accounts were made and each made a thousand dollars -- (incredibly generous) ... over the course of 5 years this accounts for 1 billion in re…
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#17I appreciate that Warren didn't let Stumpf talk his way out of taking any responsibility for the actions of his employees and made a clear argument as to why he should be held accountable. Unfortunately, it seems the primary reason he resigned was because the public outrage was loud enough. It seems that until CEOs are personally held accountable via fines or prison (as Warren suggests) we won't see a very big change…
at 63, he's the oldest ceo of all the top 5 banks. Stumpf did't resign, he retired!
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#18I appreciate that Warren didn't let Stumpf talk his way out of taking any responsibility for the actions of his employees and made a clear argument as to why he should be held accountable. Unfortunately, it seems the primary reason he resigned was because the public outrage was loud enough. It seems that until CEOs are personally held accountable via fines or prison (as Warren suggests) we won't see a very big change…
Bullshit he resinged! at 63, he's the oldest ceo of all the top 5 banks. Stumpf did't resign, he retired!
Re: How Elizabeth Warren Took Down the CEO of Wells Fargo, and Why It Matters
#19I appreciate that Warren didn't let Stumpf talk his way out of taking any responsibility for the actions of his employees and made a clear argument as to why he should be held accountable. Unfortunately, it seems the primary reason he resigned was because the public outrage was loud enough. It seems that until CEOs are personally held accountable via fines or prison (as Warren suggests) we won't see a very big change…