Live data from Hacker News

TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

trueos.org

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#11
post #3

As the site seems to be down, here's an alternative: http://www.raspbsd.org/

That's not really an alternative. The posted project is a thin client/server setup that just happens to target Raspberry Pi computers.

The Linux equivalent would be something like LTSP (http://www.ltsp.org/)

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#12
post #3

As the site seems to be down, here's an alternative: http://www.raspbsd.org/

That's not really an alternative. The posted project is a thin client/server setup that just happens to target Raspberry Pi computers. The Linux equivalent would be something like LTSP ( http://www.ltsp.org/ )

Oh, I see what you mean. Page finally loaded, thankfully.

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#13

What protocol is being used between the clients and the server? rPI's aren't too far off sunrays which worked very well, but I think ALP is prop? I've not had a play with Spice, shurely this isn't just X forwarding over SSH?

It says right on the page. X11 over SSH with optional VirtualGL.

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#14
Our company has been running LSTP on commodity hardware since 2013 for a development team, and I am truly happy with the result.

For a long time, a 2013 i7 CPU with 32 GiB RAM running LTSP over ESXi was more than enough for intensive use of 5 thin clients.

We've recently switched to a more powerful server (refurbished 48 AMD cores / 256 GB RAM) running Proxmox and despite some issues that still needs minor tweaking, I am very happy with it.

The only gray area, and the reason I am always looking for alternatives to LTSP (NX2Go is the strongest candidate), is the huge bandwidth used by LTSP: 8 Thin clients needs a sustained 600 Mbps. I'm afraid scaling over 10 / 15 workstations will require expensive network equipment but graphic user experience is near native in all aspects.

I highly recommend to anyone that is in doubt of using LTSP or any other thin client setup in production, give it a try because it actually worth it in all aspects.

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#16

I think http://www.virtualgl.org/About/Introduction (used in this product) is actually more interesting - has anyone used it?

VirtualGL is/was used in Bumblebee, the support software for Optimus cards on Linux: https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/Bumblebee/wiki/FAQ#how-...

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#17
post #14

Our company has been running LSTP on commodity hardware since 2013 for a development team, and I am truly happy with the result. For a long time, a 2013 i7 CPU with 32 GiB RAM running LTSP over ESXi was more than enough for intensive use of 5 thin clients. We've recently switched to a more powerful server (refurbished 48 AMD cores / 256 GB RAM) running Proxmox and despite some issues that still needs minor tweaking,…

> scaling over 10/15 will require expensive network equipment

Hopefully, that won't be the case soon! [0] I've no idea how far away the tech is for production use, but I'm quite excited by it myself.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2.5GBASE-T_and_5GBASE-T

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#18
post #17
post #14

Our company has been running LSTP on commodity hardware since 2013 for a development team, and I am truly happy with the result. For a long time, a 2013 i7 CPU with 32 GiB RAM running LTSP over ESXi was more than enough for intensive use of 5 thin clients. We've recently switched to a more powerful server (refurbished 48 AMD cores / 256 GB RAM) running Proxmox and despite some issues that still needs minor tweaking,…

> scaling over 10/15 will require expensive network equipment Hopefully, that won't be the case soon! [0] I've no idea how far away the tech is for production use, but I'm quite excited by it myself. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2.5GBASE-T_and_5GBASE-T

2.5gbps exists today. 10g switches are under $100/port now.

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#19
post #14

Our company has been running LSTP on commodity hardware since 2013 for a development team, and I am truly happy with the result. For a long time, a 2013 i7 CPU with 32 GiB RAM running LTSP over ESXi was more than enough for intensive use of 5 thin clients. We've recently switched to a more powerful server (refurbished 48 AMD cores / 256 GB RAM) running Proxmox and despite some issues that still needs minor tweaking,…

I remember using XDMCP ~20 years ago for this (underpowered machine as thin-client to beefy server, with graphical login). Does LTSP have additional features or better performance?

Re: TrueOS Pico – FreeBSD ARM/RPi Thin Clients

#20

I think http://www.virtualgl.org/About/Introduction (used in this product) is actually more interesting - has anyone used it?

I was interested in the thin client concept few years ago and tried virtualgl. It is really nice and impressive. There are few different configurations available. I aimed for low latency and 30 fps gaming was easy to achieve over 1gb link (it needs wide bandwith as expected).
Post reply on HN