Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
shkspr.mobi
Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
1–10 of 130 posts
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#2Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#3AMP is yet another good idea that Google didn't test properly or think through. As far as I can see, you can't click through to the actual page from an AMP page, which sucks if you want to share the link or something.
But, yes, I agree. User hostile - and there are plenty of comments on Google's product forums to support that viewpoint.
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#4https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/201...
from Google. Sites load fast and webmasters seem to like it (1), but I think it's a terrible user experience if you want to share the link etc. Apparently, Google will address this someday (2).
Regarding the issue mentioned here, of course Google can’t give direct support to all webmasters. But in my experience, the Webmaster forum is a great place to get help as it is full of smart users (and Googlers). Then I would say that, as I used to work for Google.
(1) http://digiday.com/publishers/publishers-excited-google-amp-...
(2) https://www.seroundtable.com/google-disable-amp-feedback-221...
(3) https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!forum/webmasters
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#5AMP is yet another good idea that Google didn't test properly or think through. As far as I can see, you can't click through to the actual page from an AMP page, which sucks if you want to share the link or something.
Can you explain why AMP is a good idea? I still don't really understand it, I'm afraid.
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#6Seems like a mixed blessing for users. I just started too realize that I'm getting links like https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/201... from Google. Sites load fast and webmasters seem to like it (1), but I think it's a terrible user experience if you want to share the link etc. Apparently, Google will address this someday (2). Regarding the issue mentioned here, of course Google can’t give dire…
That's not my experience. I asked about this specific problem there. All I got was uninformed amateurs saying "I don't think it can be done."
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/U3...
That seems to be a common experience - https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/3K...
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#7AMP is yet another good idea that Google didn't test properly or think through. As far as I can see, you can't click through to the actual page from an AMP page, which sucks if you want to share the link or something.
- Cut off third party ad networks
- Reduce bounce rates from Google.com to outside sites
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#8AMP is yet another good idea that Google didn't test properly or think through. As far as I can see, you can't click through to the actual page from an AMP page, which sucks if you want to share the link or something.
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#9Seems like a mixed blessing for users. I just started too realize that I'm getting links like https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/201... from Google. Sites load fast and webmasters seem to like it (1), but I think it's a terrible user experience if you want to share the link etc. Apparently, Google will address this someday (2). Regarding the issue mentioned here, of course Google can’t give dire…
Re: Google’s AMP is a gilded cage
#10Seems like a mixed blessing for users. I just started too realize that I'm getting links like https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/201... from Google. Sites load fast and webmasters seem to like it (1), but I think it's a terrible user experience if you want to share the link etc. Apparently, Google will address this someday (2). Regarding the issue mentioned here, of course Google can’t give dire…
What is the problem with sharing an amp link?