Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#2The irony is not lost on me, Arstechnica.
Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#3Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#4Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#5This big push for control of information flows is all disturbing, sounds very authoritarian. Plus the big question is what is real journalism or who decides ? The government? or are media companies just trying to build economic moats against new comers?
Sure they definitely shouldn't be deleted, but news readers probably do want the role of 'editor' returned to filter out the most obvious noise.
Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#6As I click on the article, my browser automatically redirects me to archive.is, as I have a community developed blocklist that denies any ad revenue to media websites known to have colluded through a secret mailing list for game journalists to push a political narrative. The irony is not lost on me, Arstechnica.
Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#7Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#8This big push for control of information flows is all disturbing, sounds very authoritarian. Plus the big question is what is real journalism or who decides ? The government? or are media companies just trying to build economic moats against new comers?
I know we all distrust hierarchy here but there is a reason the military is hierarchical: It is robust when under attack. We all recognize there is a value of defense in depth when it comes to security. Against an army of incentivize spammers likely one needs a layered defense. One that can adapt intelligently to unforeseen situations.
Likely this means human editors. To defuse their power probably a set of independent chief editors. It would not constitute a new system.
Failure to do that means the most excitable tribe (=where more clicks can be generated) will drown out the timeline digital airwaves. It certainly will not lead to a sensible dialog. Particular in places that have low voter participation that may sway elections.
Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#9As I click on the article, my browser automatically redirects me to archive.is, as I have a community developed blocklist that denies any ad revenue to media websites known to have colluded through a secret mailing list for game journalists to push a political narrative. The irony is not lost on me, Arstechnica.
Re: Facebook must stop presenting a newsfeed which isn't composed of real journalism
#10As I click on the article, my browser automatically redirects me to archive.is, as I have a community developed blocklist that denies any ad revenue to media websites known to have colluded through a secret mailing list for game journalists to push a political narrative. The irony is not lost on me, Arstechnica.
Could you link me to that plugin please?