Live data from Hacker News

Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

networkworld.com

21–30 of 112 posts

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#21
post #3

What a turnaround! Just a few days ago everyone was highly sympathetic towards Apple losing one of their most valued secrets (not really all that much though) and boycotting Gizmodo and everything. Now with even Jon Stewart mocking them, calling them Big Brother and asking them to look in the mirror, this has turned into a major PR disaster for Apple. IMO, if they don't respond quickly and positively, this could turn…

The sheep flock with the herd.

@sheep: Please leave Hacker News.

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#23
post #18

This is great. Apple isn't the company I fell in love with. Can anyone say that this still represents the Apple we know today: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USn5t5nQWU8

You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.

Sounds like the Apple I know and love allright :)

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#24
I'm really with Stewart on this one. Both in that I love Apple products and that I think Apple is becoming "The Man" they used to rail against. Can you be a dominant player and not be "The Man"? Well, I think Google is making a good go of it.

For what it's worth I'm going to Google I/O this year and not WWDC. Market be damned, my philosophy compels me to seek out open. And nowadays Google is out-opening Apple.

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#25
There are a couple errors in Jon Stewart's reporting. We don't know if the phone was lost or stolen.

If it was stolen then Gizmodo has broken the law.

If the phone was lost and Gizmodo did not attempt to return the phone then Gizmodo has broken the law.

It appears that Apple reported the lost/stolen phone to the DA. We don't know when. It may have been before or after the story broke.

Frankly, this whole story is overblown. It should strictly be a legal matter but it has turned into a TMZ/Valleywag story.

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#26
post #6

AT&T, Google, and Facebook know 100X more about me than Apple.

How is this relevant to the video? He didn't claim that Apple had any personal information on its users.

It sounds like you're bringing up an unrelated point to deflect attention from Apple's actions. That is not appropriate!

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#27
post #25

There are a couple errors in Jon Stewart's reporting. We don't know if the phone was lost or stolen. If it was stolen then Gizmodo has broken the law. If the phone was lost and Gizmodo did not attempt to return the phone then Gizmodo has broken the law. It appears that Apple reported the lost/stolen phone to the DA. We don't know when. It may have been before or after the story broke. Frankly, this whole story is ove…

Are there laws against attempting to return the lost after you've taken photographs of it? They did return it, they just took some pictures first.

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#28

Microsoft was supposed to be the evil one. But you guys are busting down doors in Palo Alto while Commandant Gates is ridding the world of mosquitoes! What the fuck is going on?! It's all mixed up! At least Apple doesn't charge you $80 to change your desktop background on a netbook. But otherwise, I agree. Apple is hurting the field -- locking down hardware, mandating woefully outdated legacy programming languages, a…

What do you mean by the $80 to change the background bit? (I'm not disagreeing, I genuinely don't know what you're referring to.)

Re: Jon Stewart assails Apple for becoming "Big Brother"

#29
post #17

Hmm, I think Jon took a few too many creative liberties here for the sake of entertainment. 1. According to Gizmodo the door was broken in because the journalist wasn't at home. He was having dinner in a restaurant, arrived later when the search was already in progress. The authorities acted respectfully with his belongings, etc. There is a huge difference between ringing the bell a few times and breaking the door wh…

The matter was not something that needed to be attended to at 9:45 pm on a Friday night. They could have done it during business hours. Actually, they did not even need to visit the premises. They could have used a subpoena.
Post reply on HN