Live data from Hacker News

How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

stackoverflow.blog

31–40 of 227 posts

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#31
At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM.

This sums it up well.

https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#32

At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM. This sums it up well. https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

Wow, what a hostile post. What would you think people would think of HN reading your stuff?

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#33
post #32

At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM. This sums it up well. https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

Wow, what a hostile post. What would you think people would think of HN reading your stuff?

This isn't my stuff. Though myself, and others share the same sentiment. Read the comments below the article.

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#34

At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM. This sums it up well. https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

> Responses essentially amount to go RTFM.

Let's be honest, reading the docs should be everyone's first step before posting a question. So many questions follow the template of "I want to know how to do this but I don't want to put in any effort." The volume of those kinds of questions are what drove me away - not the moderation.

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#35

At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM. This sums it up well. https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

That post contains quite a few inaccuracies and misunderstandings about SO functionality.

It has been discussed on HN recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12576124

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#36
post #14

Another good article linked from this one: https://stackoverflow.blog/2016/02/why-stack-overflow-doesnt... . Stack Overflow is IMO the site to look to if you want to do ads correctly. So many big sites have incredibly trashy ads, SO shows that they care to not subject their users to that junk.

I'm actually surprised ads work at all on StackOverflow. I would have guessed that most of their visitors are blocking ads.

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#37
post #22

Perhaps it's time they consider paying Moderators for their time and effort. It doesn't need to be anything large, even a small stipend will suffice. Moderators are the real lifeblood of StackExchange. They spend countless hours ensuring their respective Sub Exchange hums along. Yes, it's a volunteer "job", but it's a job none-the-less - especially since once you become a Moderator, it's more-or-less expected you hav…

Are you a moderator?

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#38

At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM. This sums it up well. https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

Are there any Stack-Overflow style Q&A site with communities that feel more like Hacker News(high levels of politeness)?

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#39
post #8

TLDR: They make money through ads, job postings and their enterprise product. The author believes that they can make money and serve users at the same time.

Correct. This question - HOW MUCH MONEY does Stack Overflow make per year - was asked in their Meta site. Granted it's a privately held company but there is atleast 1 answer that quotes "credible sources" and pegs it at atleast 21 MILLION USD in revenues (for 2013). Source: http://meta.stackexchange.com/a/214284/245495

According to Hoovers, their revenue is $11.33M. Source http://www.hoovers.com/company-information/company-search.ht...

Re: How We Make Money at Stack Overflow

#40

At this point, I have no desire to participate in or help stackoverflow. The attitudes there are such hostile, elitist garbage, where someone is incapable of asking a question, because it will instantly be closed by the mods. God forbid they are a newbie to the site. Responses essentially amount to go RTFM. This sums it up well. https://hackernoon.com/the-decline-of-stack-overflow-7cb69fa...

I used to be very active on SO and I stopped because dealing with new people to the site is a waste of everyones time.

SO has the goal of being a Q to A catalog. You're not contributing unless you are asking a new, answerable question or providing and answer to a new or existing question.

There are tons of people asking questions that are already answered, tons of people asking questions that would take a book to answer, and tons of people asking questions that are subjective and time sensitive. All of this needs to be closed and removed.

The fact of the matter is that tons of questions have already been asked and answered. In fact unless its for a newer technology there are probably not that many left to ask. Because of this about 95% of all new content ought to be removed. In fact you will find a vastly different culture if you stick around the GO tag vs the Java tag.

But the issue is there is a never ending trickle of people who don't realize the above. They sign up and start asking answered or impossible to answer questions, trying to start discussions, or trying to make you debug their specific issue.

You either ignore them or try and help them understand the site by telling them to RTFM.

Post reply on HN