Webhook Tester • Hacker News Board

Re: Webhook Tester

#31

Post by wmofloyd » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 4:42 AM UTC

http://www.tripleclicks.com/15984783

Re: Webhook Tester

#32

Post by wmofloyd » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 4:43 AM UTC

http://www.joinmysfiteam.com/15984783

Re: Webhook Tester

#33

Post by johns » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 6:20 AM UTC

sunsu wrote: post #22

One thing I've wanted on tools like this is an API to query what requests have hit your particular endpoint which would be useful for unit testing applications which use webhooks.

https://www.runscope.com/docs/request-capture paired with https://www.runscope.com/docs/api/messages can do that.

Or use http://blog.runscope.com/posts/monitor-your-webhook-workflow...

Re: Webhook Tester

#34

Post by nathos » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 6:30 AM UTC

Another free/open source/easily deployable to Heroku alternative is Hookable:

https://github.com/kdaigle/hookable

Re: Webhook Tester

#35

Post by fredsted » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 7:55 AM UTC

daurnimator wrote: post #29

GET requests are coming through with 'content-length: 0' when that header was not sent. Some other headers are not coming through, e.g. `te: gzip, deflate` Otherwise, trying to use HTTPS instead of HTTP takes me to "Simon’s Filedump"

HTTPS should work now! (Thanks Letsencrypt!)

Re: Webhook Tester

#36

Post by robmoorman » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 8:34 AM UTC

Auto-refresh on Chrome 54+ after added new url doesn't work

Re: Webhook Tester

#37

Post by timvdalen » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 10:40 AM UTC

Very cool! Note that your Laravel installation is in debug mode though.

When you make a request with a non-supported HTTP verb, you get the full Laravel error message back instead of just an empty 405.

Are you disallowing verbs on purpose?

Re: Webhook Tester

#38

Post by fpereira1 » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 11:10 AM UTC

fiatjaf wrote: post #23

Shameless plug: https://requesthub.xyz/ Let's you transform input data with jq and redirect the webhook to another endpoint. Kind of make-your-own Zapier. Also featuring replays.

This is really neat. The ability to replay and the transformation stuff is great

Re: Webhook Tester

#39

Post by i_use_bing » Tue, Nov 15, 2016, 11:51 AM UTC

Nice. I created https://logrequest.com, originally for my own use. Supports custom responses, ssl and cors which requestb.in didn't.

Looking at this thread there seems like a lot of similar (and better) tools so maybe I didn't look hard enough before deciding to hack something together :)