Webhook Tester • Hacker News Board

nathancahill wrote: post #4

Use history.replaceState instead of pushState on the initial page load. Also, your first history state change is missing a / causing a second state change: http://webhook.site/ http://webhook.site/#048eaf45... http://webhook.site/#/048eaf45...

Thanks!

Edit: Fixed.

Re: Webhook Tester

#14

Post by fredsted » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 8:59 PM UTC

richardwhiuk wrote: post #9

On Chrome 54, on Windows 7, I have to refresh to see the web requests, which feels like it makes the flow much worse from a UX perspective.

I'm using Pusher, and it looks like I've hit their rate limit after I posted this. Whoops!

Re: Webhook Tester

#15

Post by pkaeding » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 8:59 PM UTC

sync wrote: post #2

Looks neat. Also see http://requestb.in/ in the same vein.

The full runscope product is really powerful too. I recommend anyone who does anything with HTTP add it to their toolbox. (I have no affiliation)

Re: Webhook Tester

#16

Post by _ao789 » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 9:01 PM UTC

Reminds me of http://logvoo.com

Re: Webhook Tester

#17

Post by enraged_camel » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 9:11 PM UTC

wes-k wrote: post #11

Related: http://www.ultrahook.com - a free webhoook to localhost setup to help testing things like stripe webhoooks locally. Unaffiliated, just used recently and am big fan!

Also Ngrok: https://ngrok.com

I really like Ngrok because it also comes with a light-weight web client that lets you see requests and replay them. Replaying especially is huge for me when doing testing.

Re: Webhook Tester

#18

Post by fredsted » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 9:15 PM UTC

enraged_camel wrote: post #17

wes-k wrote: post #11

Related: http://www.ultrahook.com - a free webhoook to localhost setup to help testing things like stripe webhoooks locally. Unaffiliated, just used recently and am big fan!

Also Ngrok: https://ngrok.com I really like Ngrok because it also comes with a light-weight web client that lets you see requests and replay them. Replaying especially is huge for me when doing testing.

If you use Vagrant, "vagrant share" is built in. Very handy.

Re: Webhook Tester

#19

Post by johns » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 9:17 PM UTC

pkaeding wrote: post #15

sync wrote: post #2

Looks neat. Also see http://requestb.in/ in the same vein.

The full runscope product is really powerful too. I recommend anyone who does anything with HTTP add it to their toolbox. (I have no affiliation)

Thanks Patrick :)

Re: Webhook Tester

#20

Post by Ancient » Mon, Nov 14, 2016, 9:25 PM UTC

Neato!