Live data from Hacker News

MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

theverge.com

51–60 of 68 posts

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#51
post #12

There's nothing in this review that convinces me that the touch bar is improving anything. If anything, paragraphs like these convince me it's at best on par with just regular keys: > you no longer have one-touch access to brightness and volume adjustments; instead, you need to tap the button and then dial in your changes on a slider that pops up beside — not beneath — your finger. I’d be annoyed by that, but fortuna…

The touch bar is the type of gimmick that Apple loves though, because that's what sells hardware. When OS X was released, the Dock was that gimmick. It added "curb appeal" and demoability according to Bruce Tognazzini, an ex-Apple employee who wrote the first five editions of the Apple Human Interface Guidelines - http://www.asktog.com/columns/044top10docksucks.html

> The touch bar is the type of gimmick

Sorry if this comes off as rude, but what's the difference on HN between a gimmick and a feature? In dictionaries, it says that a gimmick is a feature that exists to get attention. However, doesn't that describe most new features in technology?

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#52
post #12

There's nothing in this review that convinces me that the touch bar is improving anything. If anything, paragraphs like these convince me it's at best on par with just regular keys: > you no longer have one-touch access to brightness and volume adjustments; instead, you need to tap the button and then dial in your changes on a slider that pops up beside — not beneath — your finger. I’d be annoyed by that, but fortuna…

The touch bar is the type of gimmick that Apple loves though, because that's what sells hardware. When OS X was released, the Dock was that gimmick. It added "curb appeal" and demoability according to Bruce Tognazzini, an ex-Apple employee who wrote the first five editions of the Apple Human Interface Guidelines - http://www.asktog.com/columns/044top10docksucks.html

[deleted]

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#53
post #12

There's nothing in this review that convinces me that the touch bar is improving anything. If anything, paragraphs like these convince me it's at best on par with just regular keys: > you no longer have one-touch access to brightness and volume adjustments; instead, you need to tap the button and then dial in your changes on a slider that pops up beside — not beneath — your finger. I’d be annoyed by that, but fortuna…

The easiest solution to keeping both power users and the other users would've been to keep the function keys and the escape key as they were and add the touch bar located one row above.

Apple has historically avoided worst of both worlds solutions.

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#54
post #45

Lets not forget, it is also a touch of the past: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press_kits/2008/connecting... (not claiming the two are similar in some way, just following the idea back to where it was born) I remember when this laptop was being sold I considered it since was "small" for that time, but ended up buying something else since I didn't like the touch panel below the screen.

This is like the Creative Nomad vs the iPod. HP was first to market with everything that's in the new MBP but it's incredibly unpolished and downright cumbersome to the point that it's hard to tell that these products do mostly the same thing. This how Apple captures the market, when they release a product it's so polished and functional, and they commit 100% to it that it almost always succeeds. HP and others don't spend much time if any refining ideas, they just throw sh*t against the wall and hope it sticks.

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#55
post #21

Fine, it has a new keyboard thing that you may or may not like, we are going to buy it anyway. But how does the verge not address what everyone really cares about: the CPU! The MacBook without the touchbar has a MacBook Air class CPU while the one with a touchbar is in another class. How do the non touchbar models compare with the previous air models and how do the touchbar models compare with the previous pro genera…

As far as I have seen in some benchmarks the new non-touchbar model (with the lower TDP CPU) is as about the same speed as my last-gen (2015) MBP 13" with the 28W TDP CPU. So it's a lower speed CPU class but due to the newer CPU generation the performance is the same. You can see it in a positive way: It didn't get slower Or in the negative way: You get an actually worse CPU class for more money than the previous gen…

Since the non-touchbar model has the MacBook Air class CPU and your 2015 MPB has the higher voltage pro class CPU I'd say that's quite an improvement.

This years "MacBook Air" like model is as powerful as last years MacBook Pro? Money should be flying out of our wallets.

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#56
post #45

Lets not forget, it is also a touch of the past: http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press_kits/2008/connecting... (not claiming the two are similar in some way, just following the idea back to where it was born) I remember when this laptop was being sold I considered it since was "small" for that time, but ended up buying something else since I didn't like the touch panel below the screen.

This is like the Creative Nomad vs the iPod. HP was first to market with everything that's in the new MBP but it's incredibly unpolished and downright cumbersome to the point that it's hard to tell that these products do mostly the same thing. This how Apple captures the market, when they release a product it's so polished and functional, and they commit 100% to it that it almost always succeeds. HP and others don't…

Again, I am not trying to compare the two. Just to provide some history, something tech journalists are seemingly very bad at.

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#57
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is like the Creative Nomad vs the iPod. HP was first to market with everything that's in the new MBP but it's incredibly unpolished and downright cumbersome to the point that it's hard to tell that these products do mostly the same thing. This how Apple captures the market, when they release a product it's so polished and functional, and they commit 100% to it that it almost always succeeds. HP and others don't…

Again, I am not trying to compare the two. Just to provide some history, something tech journalists are seemingly very bad at.

They also seem to be bad at parroting baseless claims, like faulting Apple for not releasing a processor that doesn't exist yet.

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#58
post #38

One major let-down for me in macbook pros is the lack of a nvidia GPU. You can't do serious machine learning on those laptops. I actually had to buy a previous-gen macbook pro I'm not sure what to do if I had to get a new laptop. On one hand, I have a few iOS projects, and on the other hand, it's always nice to run locally and quickly a few deep learning algos. The limited connections are also a let down

With Thunderbolt 3 (via the four USB-C ports), you could quite easily run desktop class GPUs in a relatively small enclosure. There's a couple of them previously available on Amazon, but I'm sure the offerings will skyrocket after the first of the year given the new laptop.

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#59
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would certainly guess that the OS gets pre-emptive access to it in much the same way as it can trap system key interrupts before they go to applications, but I'm still wary until there's a lot more information available on this. Another case is what if the app decides to replace the ESC key altogether? If that's prohibited somehow then what's the advantage of removing the physical key? TBH, a separate OS sounds lik…

Just read the Ars review - it looks like the bar is divided into three, with only the middle area fully under app control (the left hand area showing dialogue box controls or escape). It does say that the bar slows down under heavy load though.

Hm, so what happens when an application locks up with a dialog open? Sounds like you may need to CMD+TAB first to get the ESC key back, which is at best going to be a nuisance (and I'm not sure exactly which OSX shortcuts are non-maskable in the way that CTRL+ALT+DEL is in Windows).

Re: MacBook Pro with Touch Bar review: a touch of the future

#60
post #47
post #20

Steve (quite probably imo) wouldn't have allowed this to happen! I have little doubt that in a couple years, the technology Apple has been waiting for will arrive and this vision, or something closer to it, will be complete. Apple just released this machine too soon, or was too aggressive in the decisions it made.

Can we just stop the "Steve would never..." stupidity, please? 1: He's gone. It doesn't matter anymore. 2: We'll never know what he'd have done in this situation. Seriously. Everyone keeps pinning every single mistake Apple does to Steves absence. Have people completely forgotten that Apple made mistakes with Steve at the helm as well? There are too many to count, but in this specific case, it could be reasonable to…

Another one on the iPhone was the lack of 3G in the first release. Most phones of a similar price point had it at that time.
Post reply on HN