New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
81–90 of 163 posts
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#82Damn that is really scary. I used to work in Miramar (Wellington suburbs), which is built on reclaimed sea, if I recall, and everyone was freaked out that a major earthquake would liquify the entire area.
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#83Magnitude 7.5 earthquake. For reference, I felt this in Hamilton, a bit under 1,000 KM away. First earthquake I have ever felt. Hamilton never, ever gets earthquakes. Nevertheless, NZ infrastructure is built to withstand this sort of stuff. Only $100m-1b economic damage is expected, no casualties expected.
The problem with earthquakes is that damage accumulates. So while a building might stay intact or with minor damages during the main one, the aftershocks could wreck havoc. And with an 7.8 aftershocks could last for months and be quite severe. Nevertheless I hope everyone is OK and wish you the best. I've experienced quite a few earthquakes in my life, although nothing over 7, and the shock stays for long. It's one o…
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#84Does anybody know the status of RocketLab's facilities [1]? [1] https://rocketlabusa.com/rocket-lab-launch-complex-1-ready-f...
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#85Can someone please edit the title? And wow, this looks heavy. I hope everyone is well.
There's that word again. "Heavy." Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#86Does anyone know if there is any special effort to construct buildings that can withstand reasonable earthquakes in New Zealand? Christchurch seems particularly prone to quakes in New Zealand. I hope the people of New Zealand are safe.
Yes, there are earthquake standards for new buildings, and mandatory retrofitting for older buildings (as they are updated). From what I've seen, this is pretty similar to San Francisco. It would be interesting to see data comparing the standards across earthquake-prone countries/regions.
To be honest I think you're probably safer in a large earthquake in a post Christchurch NZ than in a small earthquake in a country that doesn't usually get them.
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#87Does anybody know the status of RocketLab's facilities [1]? [1] https://rocketlabusa.com/rocket-lab-launch-complex-1-ready-f...
Oh those are well up the North Island, they probably didn't even feel it there. Or if they did, it would have been very mild.
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#88Videos of the earthquake: https://youtu.be/WcljQHCUm_o?t=20 https://youtu.be/EsnS28ulJUw News say it's 7.4 - 7.8 magnitude.
Hmm, I doubt that these videos are the NZ quake. It happened at around midnight, and those videos are in broad daylight. EDIT: I see others have already corrected this misinformation.
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#89Unfortunately the "Latest Felt Quakes Map" at http://www.weatherwatch.co.nz/geonet doesn't work because the website has exceeded 25,000 map loads in a day.
Re: New Zealand earthquake: Tsunami follows powerful tremor
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's that word again. "Heavy." Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?
It's surfer slang, elements of which have made their way into a lot of the English spoken in NZ, Oz and SA.
It's British (probably Commonwealth) English for serious or important. See usage 6: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/heavy (unfortunately, no dates given on the quotes).
This lists the usage meaning "severe" as from 1849: http://historicalthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.uk/category/?id=15861...