Live data from Hacker News

Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

arstechnica.com

91–100 of 150 posts

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#91
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bingo. Promises, for Trump, are fulfilled upon announcement, and then forgotten. The examples are legion.

Honestly what else is new? I voted for Obama on pledges he'd end the war in Iraq and close down the constitutional abomination that is Guantanamo. 8 years later and here we are.

The president can't do anything if Congress opposes him.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#92
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bingo. Promises, for Trump, are fulfilled upon announcement, and then forgotten. The examples are legion.

So, he is already a real politician. Any different to Obama promising to close Guantanamo bay? And I say this as an Obama supporter.

For one, Obama has actually made progress towards accomplishing that, despite the Congress's efforts to block it.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#93
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the polls are rigged! he actually won by more!

You were downvoted, but I have actually heard this precise sentiment - Clinton didn't demand a recount because it helps her hide the evidence that she cheated.

Presumably it's all the work of the vast anti-Electoral College conspiracy.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#94
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly what else is new? I voted for Obama on pledges he'd end the war in Iraq and close down the constitutional abomination that is Guantanamo. 8 years later and here we are.

The president can't do anything if Congress opposes him.

When it comes to Trump, that could be a good thing.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bull. There aren't examples and for you to say hat, speaks falsely to honesty and openness. Check your lies at the door.

A few forgotten promises from the campaign trail: "I will release my tax returns when Obama releases his birth certificate." - http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2011/04/donald-trump-intervi... "If I run for office I will absolutely release my tax returns." - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hg-5KEt1Abg "Melania will hold a press conference on questions about her immigration." - https://twitter.com/JDiamond1/status/76315…

That first tax returns quote is wrong (or the source is wrong). He said he might do it, not that he would do it.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I believe you misunderstood the parent post. They were pointing out the hypocrisy of caring about unprotected email servers now while not caring when it was done by a member of the same party. I don't believe the parent comment was saying that unprotected email servers are a-okay, just voicing frustration at the hypocrisy of the Republican party on that particular issue. It's possible tha…

What is definitely the case is that hypocrisy is one of the "deadly sins" trump just demonstrated is mostly made of hot air.

In my opinion, hypocrisy is like cherry-picking data. It exists to validate your potentially false claims or misguide those viewing your results. Sometimes it's intentional and other times it is innocent. Sure, the results of the election shows that perhaps hypocrisy, at least the kind shown about the email servers, wasn't a deciding factor this time; however, should the hypocrisy turn into distinct lies and reveal any intended misguidance, I do hope it regains importance.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I may have been a bit hyperbolic about freeloaders. The bigger point I want to make is that the standard deviation on returns of a single venture like Trump's is so large that you cannot meaningfully compare it to a highly-diversified basket of stocks. To use your analogy, it'd be like evaluating the effectiveness of a coach in a swimming event by picking a single one of their swimmers and comparing them to the avera…

I feel like you're making an argument against your thesis instead of for it (?). With higher risk, you expect higher return... so isn't that another tick against Trump's "success"? His ventures were way riskier than an index fund (see bankruptcies and losses), yet they had a markedly lower return. That means they were not good investments.

Well there are two possibilities: 1) Trump's businesses are lower risk and so the lower realized return is as expected 2) there is significant idiosyncratic risk in a single company which can diversified away with the S&P500 while maintaining the same expected return.

I disbelieve (1) because of his multiple high-profile bankruptcies.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#98
post #94
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The president can't do anything if Congress opposes him.

When it comes to Trump, that could be a good thing.

Republicans control the House and Senate.

And Trump isn't going to veto conservative signature pieces like repealing ObamaCare.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#99
post #47
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Concur wholeheartedly. Just not very optimistic. But who knows?

If he doesn't keep his word we'll have ammo to oust him in 4 years, perhaps impeach him sooner, perhaps revise congress in 2 years. Otherwise, we get the change we want.

Be careful what you wish for. I can't stand Trump and don't support him at all. But he's got a damn good insurance policy against impeachment in the form of Pence. Pence is a religious nutbag and would be a million times worse than Trump, if you can comprehend a level of bad that awful.

Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger

#100
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When it comes to Trump, that could be a good thing.

Republicans control the House and Senate. And Trump isn't going to veto conservative signature pieces like repealing ObamaCare.

Democrats controlled the house and senate Obama's first term.
Post reply on HN