Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have serious doubts. I think the one thing that this election has proven is that fact-checking is dead. PolitiFact rated 70% of Trump's reviewed statements as at least "mostly false" and there were basically zero consequences. The next election cycle is going to be brutal.
> there were basically zero consequences 50%+ of the country voted against him. It's up to us hold his feet to the fire and wake up the other 50%.
Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
71–80 of 150 posts
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#72Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have serious doubts. I think the one thing that this election has proven is that fact-checking is dead. PolitiFact rated 70% of Trump's reviewed statements as at least "mostly false" and there were basically zero consequences. The next election cycle is going to be brutal.
> there were basically zero consequences 50%+ of the country voted against him. It's up to us hold his feet to the fire and wake up the other 50%.
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#74Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bingo. Promises, for Trump, are fulfilled upon announcement, and then forgotten. The examples are legion.
I think, despite political affiliation, it's our obligation to hold him to the promises we believe in and galvanize his fired-up base to do so as well. I voted for Clinton and volunteered for the campaign, but I'll gladly push him to keep his word on this promise and the others that I believe will benefit our country.
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have serious doubts. I think the one thing that this election has proven is that fact-checking is dead. PolitiFact rated 70% of Trump's reviewed statements as at least "mostly false" and there were basically zero consequences. The next election cycle is going to be brutal.
> there were basically zero consequences 50%+ of the country voted against him. It's up to us hold his feet to the fire and wake up the other 50%.
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
If he doesn't keep his word we'll have ammo to oust him in 4 years, perhaps impeach him sooner, perhaps revise congress in 2 years. Otherwise, we get the change we want.
I have serious doubts. I think the one thing that this election has proven is that fact-checking is dead. PolitiFact rated 70% of Trump's reviewed statements as at least "mostly false" and there were basically zero consequences. The next election cycle is going to be brutal.
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
> there were basically zero consequences 50%+ of the country voted against him. It's up to us hold his feet to the fire and wake up the other 50%.
Word to the wise, less people voted for Trump than they did for Mitt Romney in 2012 (although they are still counting), and Romney lost. Next time, put someone up who could be voted for, not just point to someone to vote against.
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Politifact is blatantly biased. Bernie and Trump made the same claim about african american youth unemployment, and they rated Trump a liar and Bernie honest [0][1]. [0]: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/jul/... [1]: http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/jun/20/do...
The primary difference there appears to be that the Sanders campaign answered a request for where their numbers came from with references, and the Trump campaign did not respond, leaving the (different) author to attempt to research the topic themself.
Re: Trump, our next president, promised to block AT&T/Time Warner merger
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Could you explain your thoughts on how those two ideas are necessarily inconsistent with each other?
Well, one is removing a thing, and the other is adding the same thing. QED _inconsistent_.