Live data from Hacker News

The People's Code

code.gov

201–203 of 203 posts

Re: The People's Code

#201
post #80

Horrible name - the Federal Government of the United States is not "the People".

And horrible domain name: How come `code.gov` is US-only? How come it's motto is "Help propel America’s next breakthrough in innovation"? If this in not imperialism, I don;t know what is.

Then you don't know what imperialism is. Simple as that.

Re: The People's Code

#202

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Crypto and democracy can't be compared. You can delegate advanced science, you should not delegate democracy, because it's the root of all the rest.

Isn't delegating democracy what we do when we elect someone to congress (or parliament) to draft, debate, and enact the law?

We are not, in fact, in a democracy at all. But that's for another debate, right now I'm using the current convention to express an idea.

Re: The People's Code

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, with monopsony it's rather simple: "If you don't publish the code, then we will have to use paper ballots."

No effort towards innovation would then go into that sector. Ever again.

Hmm. No effort, ever again, in open source products? I wonder what RMS, Linus Torvalds, and the BSD folks have to say about that?

Seriously, the open source movement has generated some pretty good businesses. Maybe the case can be made that electoral equipment is an exception to that.

But asserting the proposition doesn't prove it.

Post reply on HN