Time to Dump Time Zones
nytimes.com
Time to Dump Time Zones
1–10 of 555 posts
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#2"A century and a half ago, time zones didn’t exist."
Sure. How old are the concepts of noon? Midnight? The transition to railroad time and time zones wasn't from a single time zone to many, but from incredibly local time zones (what time is noon in this town?) to fewer.
Likely a lack of imagination or caffeination on my part, but it's hard for me to imagine what it would be like to have shops open at, say 22:00. And we still need to take into account differences across the world for coordinating with people. It's not like we're going to change our diurnal habits just because it's, say, 14:00 across the world at the same time.
Wow. This is one of the most caustic comments I've left on HN. Someone back me off of the ledge. Off to read the Cato Institute commentary linked to in the article.
(And you kids! Get off my lawn!)
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#3grr... "A century and a half ago, time zones didn’t exist." Sure. How old are the concepts of noon? Midnight? The transition to railroad time and time zones wasn't from a single time zone to many, but from incredibly local time zones (what time is noon in this town?) to fewer. Likely a lack of imagination or caffeination on my part, but it's hard for me to imagine what it would be like to have shops open at, say 22:0…
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#4grr... "A century and a half ago, time zones didn’t exist." Sure. How old are the concepts of noon? Midnight? The transition to railroad time and time zones wasn't from a single time zone to many, but from incredibly local time zones (what time is noon in this town?) to fewer. Likely a lack of imagination or caffeination on my part, but it's hard for me to imagine what it would be like to have shops open at, say 22:0…
Still holding out for someone with a compelling argument. After all, 1 is simpler than 39, right?
[0]: https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/changing-times
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#5If people were to adapt UTC, those would be 12:00 and 16:00 respectively.
And that just reinforces the main point, that the numbers are largely arbitrary -- but descriptions like "after mid-day" (p.m.) aren't.
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#6Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#7I think the article makes a valid point but it can't get past Americanisms like "noon" or "4 p.m." If people were to adapt UTC, those would be 12:00 and 16:00 respectively. And that just reinforces the main point, that the numbers are largely arbitrary -- but descriptions like "after mid-day" (p.m.) aren't.
Huh. I had never thought of these as Americanisms (though being from the States I might say that, right?) I've lived abroad in a country that uses a 24-hour clock for more official uses, and 12-hour clocks for more informal, spoken uses, including the use of the concept of "noon".
Given my small sample size, I looked at Wikipedia to see how time is referenced in other countries. I was surprised to see that the first five countries I looked at all have mixed usage of 24-hour and 12-hour (except for Thailand, which has a 6-hour clock).
Both the 12-hour and 24-hour notations are used in the United Kingdom. The 12-hour notation is still widely used in ordinary life, written communication and displays, and continues to be used in spoken language.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_the_...
Turkey uses the 24-hour clock system. In informal speech, however, the 12-hour clock is more commonly used. When speaking in the 12-hour system, the words such as "sabah" (morning), "akşam" (evening) or "gece" (night) are generally used before telling the time to clarify whether it is a.m. or p.m.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_Turk...
In Thailand, official time is indicated in 24-hour clock system; however, a six-hour clock system is also used, especially in spoken language. It divides the day into four six-hour periods, with additional words added to make the night-morning-afternoon-evening distinction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_Thai...
In spoken Swedish however, the 12-hour clock is much more common.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_Swed...
In common spoken language, times are given in 12-hour clock, and those between 1 and 11 are assumed to be post meridiem, past noon, if not otherwise noted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_notation_in_Spai...
I haven't done an exhaustive search through the rest, but this does strongly suggest that these are not only Americanisms. If I'm missing something, or misinterpreting what you're saying (which wouldn't be the first time :) please let me know and clarify.
As for the numbers being arbitrary, I agree. There is a utility to the choice of 24 hours in a day. That doesn't get around the behavior of humans, where our own biology follows the sun. We'll for the most part be awake when the sun is up, likely be active in community during the middle of the day, at home in the morning and evening. In a global world, we need some way to coordinate with people living at different longitudes, especially for synchronous tasks. Is there a significant difference between needing to know that working hours is from 9:00 and 17:00 in London and from 4:00 and 12:00 in New York, and looking up the time difference between London and New York is 5 hours? Six of one, half-dozen of the other, seems to me.
We'll still need some way general convention locally as well. It'd be interesting to see what the business hours are (at a per-business level, perhaps) in relation to the time zone and nearness to time zone borders, and see if there are any trends for businesses compensating based on what the time zone is for the majority of the local population. There'd still need to be some convention for locales. With a limited number of time zones, that decision and coordination is taken care of.
Maybe I'm approaching this wrong, but so far what I've read hasn't convinced me that getting rid of time zones does anything more than shift the issue elsewhere. Given that it makes sense to some people, I'm open to hearing more. While I might not agree with some opinions, I generally want to be able to understand how people come to them. Thanks for reading!
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#8Now would be a good time to adopt this change since the way standard units (mass, length, time, etc.) are being redefined.
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#9Time zones and, worse, leap seconds interfere and needlessly complicate recorded time--the ability to compare two times and compute the time interval between them. Anyone who has tried to geophysical data from diverse locations and organizations knows how difficult that is. Now would be a good time to adopt this change since the way standard units (mass, length, time, etc.) are being redefined.
As an aside, please don't conflate the issues of leap seconds (or leap days, or daylight savings time) with time zones. They're at least three distinct topics. Interesting, yes, but distinct from time zones.
I agree that management of temporal data across the globe is a challenging process. That's why some domains agree to operate in UTC all the time. And some of our common tooling (JavaScript in the browser comes immediately to mind) doesn't do a very good job in providing good methods for handing time zones. I think the answer to that is to improve our tooling. While removing time zones might make this recorded time issue go away, it seems problematic that we'd make a societal change to compensate for computer deficiencies.
What do you think? In particular, how would society work without time zones? What do you see as the trade offs?
Re: Time to Dump Time Zones
#105 comments, 6 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12885299
3 comments, 22 hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12882318