Can someone explain how the frequency domain stuff works? I've never really understood that, and the article just waves it away with saying it's like converting from binary to hex.
H.264 is Magic
81–90 of 230 posts
Re: H.264 is Magic
#82Even better H.265 with 40-50% bit rate reduction compared with H.264, at the same visual quality!
Re: H.264 is Magic
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
>why wouldn't any local media playback seek backwards and reconstruct the full frame? Most codecs/players do. VLC used to be criticized for being different in that regard. One possible advantage is istantaneous seeking, as there's no need to decode all the needed frames (which could amount to several seconds of video) between the nearest I-frames[1] (the complete reference pictures) and the desired one. [1]: plural,…
I try to use VLC when I can because it offers intuitive playlist support, but for high-resolution H.264 and friends I usually have to switch to Media Player Classic. VLC is willing to let my entire screen look like a blob of grey alien shit for 10 seconds instead of just taking a moment to reconstruct frames. And its hardware acceleration for newer codecs is balls. Sucks because otherwise, it's right up there with f2…
Re: H.264 is Magic
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
>why wouldn't any local media playback seek backwards and reconstruct the full frame? Most codecs/players do. VLC used to be criticized for being different in that regard. One possible advantage is istantaneous seeking, as there's no need to decode all the needed frames (which could amount to several seconds of video) between the nearest I-frames[1] (the complete reference pictures) and the desired one. [1]: plural,…
I try to use VLC when I can because it offers intuitive playlist support, but for high-resolution H.264 and friends I usually have to switch to Media Player Classic. VLC is willing to let my entire screen look like a blob of grey alien shit for 10 seconds instead of just taking a moment to reconstruct frames. And its hardware acceleration for newer codecs is balls. Sucks because otherwise, it's right up there with f2…
[0] https://mpv.io/
Re: H.264 is Magic
#85Re: H.264 is Magic
#86Do H.264 and WebRTC have different use cases? Or do they compete directly?
Re: H.264 is Magic
#87What are directions for the future? Could neural networks become practically useful for video compression? [1] [1] http://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/courses/soco/projects...
Re: H.264 is Magic
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is an open standard. Anyone can purchase and implement it, and it was developed by ISO. The technologies are not royalty free in the US. Don't conflate the two. * Edit: I emphasize this mainly because the terms have a specific meaning in standards jargon but also because it places the blame for software patent abuses on the wrong parties (the standards developers rather than the lawyers and legislators).
OK, so it is open, but not free ? Is it available for academic purposes free of cost ?
Re: H.264 is Magic
#89> Even at 2%, you don't notice the difference at this zoom level. 2%!
I'm not supposed to see that major streakiness? The 2% difference is extremely visible, even 11% leaves a noticably bad pattern on the keys (though I'd probably be okay with it in a moving video), only the 30% difference looks acceptable in a still image.
Re: H.264 is Magic
#90Damn, lost me during the frequency part.