I initially recognized that as 504/92 based on the slant. Character recognition can be surprisingly context sensitive.
Re: Using neural nets to recognize handwritten digits
#11"Most people effortlessly recognize those digits as 504192."
11–15 of 15 posts
I initially recognized that as 504/92 based on the slant. Character recognition can be surprisingly context sensitive.
Neutral nets to recognize digits were the holy Grail of postal mail sorting in the '80s!
"Most people effortlessly recognize those digits as 504192." I initially recognized that as 504/92 based on the slant. Character recognition can be surprisingly context sensitive.
Unless it is the same person who created this PDF and this [1], it's some kind of plagiarism. [1] http://neuralnetworksanddeeplearning.com
This is fermatslibrary.com a platform to annotate scientific papers. But I don't understand why that paper you cited is there - it's easy to read already.