Live data from Hacker News

Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

cloudonaut.io

111–120 of 124 posts

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#111
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

$20 a month for the DO droplet, but out of curiosity what's the monthly bandwidth bill from AWS? That's always the kicker - bandwidth from AWS is not cheap.

Why would he pay AWS anything?

He says he's using S3 for media and uploads? Unless I'm misreading it.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#112
EasyEngine would be easier for creating wordpress websites :p

ee site create mysite.com --wpfc --php7 # install wordpress + nginx fastcgi_cache, with php7

ee site create mysite.com --wpredis --php7 # install wordpress + nginx redis_cache with php7

I have yet to see a site of mine, which breaks my limits on a 5$/month droplet.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#113
post #90
post #18

Why is anyone running WordPress anymore.? So many better options.100s if not 1,000s. The fact that you need elaborate guides to host it one of the most common hosting providers is yet another example. It's junk. Time to move on. Edit: and the down votes are why this piece of garbage lives on. Please stop trying to hide how awful WordPress is. We all know it's terrible. Just because you work on it for a living doesn't…

Please don't comment like this on Hacker News. The quality of WordPress is not relevant to this article, and even if it were we would ask you to say something substantive rather than simply calling it junk. The guidelines also ask you not to complain about downvotes, so please review them here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html .

Please do not use "please" in a passive aggressive manner when you are giving an authoritative command. Use please when you are genuinely requesting someone does something as a favor to you. When you are giving an order, be and adult and just give the order.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#114
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By serverless I mean version of the wp which could use Google functions ( https://cloud.google.com/functions/ ) or Amazon Lambda ( https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/ ) or Microsoft Azure Functions ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/functions/ ) It would provide unlimited and automatic scaling, simplified setup/architecture and we would pay only for what we use.

Most blog content is static, why would you need to use lambda for anything ? you already get automatic scaling by putting static files on S3. What Wordpress functionality would need to be implemented with Lambda ?

I run a static blog on S3 using Lambda. I upload a markdown post to an S3 bucket, Lambda runs Hugo (could be Jekyll, or whatever) to regenerate the appropriate files, then uploads it to an output buckets, invalidates the files it needs to in Cloudfront, etc.

Not infeasible to think you could use Lambda to generate a static cache of a WP site onto S3 and update files on demand.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI: This post is not about your personal 2-reader a month Wordpress setup but for sites scaling to the size of TC.

FYI: You can run a professional blog on wordpress.com for about $100 a year (highest plan) and it will take millions of visitors. The smallest production instance on AWS is about $100 a month (c4.large) for 1 core (+intel HT) + 4GB ram + a few GB of EBS volume. The setup requires at least 4 hosts, thus that's a start price of $400 a month + the other fees (hardly 10% more :D). It's f * insane to pay more than $400 pe…

Been trying to say this for years. AWS is expensive and unnecessary for most blogs and small websites.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#116

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI: This post is not about your personal 2-reader a month Wordpress setup but for sites scaling to the size of TC.

FYI: You can run a professional blog on wordpress.com for about $100 a year (highest plan) and it will take millions of visitors. The smallest production instance on AWS is about $100 a month (c4.large) for 1 core (+intel HT) + 4GB ram + a few GB of EBS volume. The setup requires at least 4 hosts, thus that's a start price of $400 a month + the other fees (hardly 10% more :D). It's f * insane to pay more than $400 pe…

If you're aware of the particulars of how they work, why are t2 instances not a production instance type?

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Came here to say the same thing - I'd love to see a monthly cost on a setup that looks like this... or anything on AWS. I can run many many WP sites on a $10/month box (not AWS) with proper config tunings.

FYI: This post is not about your personal 2-reader a month Wordpress setup but for sites scaling to the size of TC.

I'm not talking about your personal 2 reader a month setups either. There are high amounts of traffic, I just have proper caching setup. Administrative interface is the only thing you can't cache and that's low traffic.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Came here to say the same thing - I'd love to see a monthly cost on a setup that looks like this... or anything on AWS. I can run many many WP sites on a $10/month box (not AWS) with proper config tunings.

What service do you use?

Linode's $10 plan recently bumped to 2GB RAM so I've been using that (Digital Ocean only offers 1GB)

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#119
post #113
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don't comment like this on Hacker News. The quality of WordPress is not relevant to this article, and even if it were we would ask you to say something substantive rather than simply calling it junk. The guidelines also ask you not to complain about downvotes, so please review them here: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html .

Please do not use "please" in a passive aggressive manner when you are giving an authoritative command. Use please when you are genuinely requesting someone does something as a favor to you. When you are giving an order, be and adult and just give the order.

Someone can request and command something at the same time. Presumably, the administrators don't want to have to take down posts and police the site, and appreciate it when users don't make their lives more difficult. This makes the "please" seem legitimate to me.

I also disagree on characterizing the usage as "passive-aggressive." I would just call it polite. Underscoring your authority with a peremptory tone seems worse to me.

Re: Wordpress on AWS: smooth and pain free

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI: You can run a professional blog on wordpress.com for about $100 a year (highest plan) and it will take millions of visitors. The smallest production instance on AWS is about $100 a month (c4.large) for 1 core (+intel HT) + 4GB ram + a few GB of EBS volume. The setup requires at least 4 hosts, thus that's a start price of $400 a month + the other fees (hardly 10% more :D). It's f * insane to pay more than $400 pe…

If you're aware of the particulars of how they work, why are t2 instances not a production instance type?

Because t2 are NOT production instances.

They are cheap, overrallocated, burstable instances with a low quota of CPU usage (about 10% for a t2.micro). They can burst over the quota for short period of time and they can be interrupted for short period of time.

In short, the instance can pause anytime and stop processing traffic.

Try running a production database on that see where it gets you ;)

Post reply on HN