Live data from Hacker News

How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

whitehouse.gov

71–80 of 86 posts

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#71
post #41
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I understand correctly, Bill could end up with @FLOTUS?

Bill would be styled "First Gentleman", so FGOTUS?

And remember he's also still called 'President Clinton' as an honorary title; as are all former presidents. So, they would be addressed as 'President and President Clinton' if Hillary won!

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#72
post #13
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they do that, then the new POTUS account will start at 0 followers (unless they have a special agreement with Twitter).

> If they do that, then the new POTUS account will start at 0 followers (unless they have a special agreement with Twitter). They must have made some sort of arrangement. The article states: The account will retain its more than 11 million followers, but start with no tweets on the timeline.

They just do a password reset on a Twitter admin account and have the NSA forward them the email.

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#74

Everyone here is talking about what is going to happen if Hillary is elected. Is @realDonaldTrump really going to give up tweeting from his account if elected? I'd be surprised.

In a hypothetical situation where Donald Trump is elected President of the United States, your concern is:

> Is @realDonaldTrump really going to give up tweeting from his account

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#75
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I understand correctly, Bill could end up with @FLOTUS?

First Lad of the United States

I have visions of Bill, passed out in a hammock on the White House lawn, surrounded by empties and cheeto packets.

Living the dream.

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#77
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I worry about polarization to such an extent that administration N might spend millions of dollars to develop tools useful for the running of the nation and, upon transition, these tools are negated to administration M almost purely on an ideological bases. In other words, we are not supposed to be developing software and tools at the White House, or anywhere else, to support a particular political party but rather i…

Do you have any evidence to support your worry? It seems to me that it's mostly unfounded. Nothing like what you describe has ever happened in the past.

Someone would have to start tracking this stuff to have proper evidence: I'm not sure the studies have been done.

However, I don't think it is unfounded. For some years we've had a congress set on refusing things Obama is for - even if they are wanted by the people. They are presently intent on appealing so-called 'Obamacare' instead of sitting down and working on it to make it better. They seem to have lost the ability to, you know, make compromises. They seem bent on un-doing anything that the other party has done.

These are the same folks that will legislate things so that they look good, but then fail to fund it - basically rendering it useless. And i'm pretty sure things like this happen at city and state levels as well. It certainly appears so at times, anyway.

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#78
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you have any evidence to support your worry? It seems to me that it's mostly unfounded. Nothing like what you describe has ever happened in the past.

Someone would have to start tracking this stuff to have proper evidence: I'm not sure the studies have been done. However, I don't think it is unfounded. For some years we've had a congress set on refusing things Obama is for - even if they are wanted by the people. They are presently intent on appealing so-called 'Obamacare' instead of sitting down and working on it to make it better. They seem to have lost the abil…

There is a big difference between gridlock due to legitimate political disagreements(1) and the dumping of useful apolitical software just because it happened to be written when the other party was in power.

1. It's interesting that you chose to use Obamacare as something that is "wanted by the people" when a majority of Americans disapprove of the law. http://www.people-press.org/2016/04/27/more-americans-disapp...

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#79
post #11

I used to work at the White House in the Presidential Personnel Office where I worked on an internal staffing tool to help fill political appointed positions across government. As we poured hours and contracting dollars into, we wondered aloud many times whether our work would go on into the next administration. The tool and the workflow behind it is pretty standard so there shouldn't be any reason why not. The gener…

I worry about polarization to such an extent that administration N might spend millions of dollars to develop tools useful for the running of the nation and, upon transition, these tools are negated to administration M almost purely on an ideological bases. In other words, we are not supposed to be developing software and tools at the White House, or anywhere else, to support a particular political party but rather i…

I took the above content to mean that a Democratic president would already have ties to the Whitehouse, and maybe be familiar w/the tool already, hence more comfortable with it and willing to keep using. It didn't read to me like an ideological motivation. Rather it's like when companies get a new CEO they come in and change everything and move the company headquarters to be closer to their house. Or when many programmers first start working with a new codebase. "What the hell? That last guy had no idea what he was doing!"

Re: How the Presidential Transition Works in the Social Media Age

#80

wait a minute... the President is communicating on a private server account ? not via a "secure" government server? someone tell Comey quick so he can write another letter to Congress revealing this madness. We still have a week left. I wonder if any other government employees are too. I wonder if any are passing classified info thru them, especially in DM's.

Last I checked Obama never sent and received classified information through his Twitter account, nor deleted anything from his Twitter account after learning it would likely be investigated.

Hillary never deleted anything after she learned of the investigation.

Her lawyers were given specific instructions and they followed them.

Post reply on HN