You two are both doing the "ATM machine" thing. (PAM = Pluggable Authentication Module) "Written as a PAM" sure feels wrong on the lips, though.
Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
101–110 of 134 posts
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but you're ignoring the functionality loss from not having the function keys. You may not use them, but many people do. For example, in Emacs (and I'm assuming most IDEs) I can map a function key to run my tests and have a status bar entry saying how many passed or failed. It's the exact functionality in your screenshot, no touch bar required. At best the touch bar is a nice gimmick, and it's not adding anythin…
Remind me again how function keys can produce full colour multitouch interfaces, such as video/image scrubbers, colour pickers, etc. The standard "function keys can do anything" response is getting old.
The "I need to pick colors and scrub video" response is getting old. Nobody does that stuff often enough for it to be a good trade off.
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#103I have a feeling this is EXTREMELY DANGEROUS to have on your Mac. Using DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES and attacker could inject code that swizzles -[LAContext evaluatePolicy: localizedReason:reply] to always invoke the callback block with success set to YES. e.g. DYLD_FORCE_FLAT_NAMESPACE=1 DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES=evil.dylib my_sudo rekt This won't work on SIP protected binaries (n.b. system binaries), but might still work on…
This would not work. setuid binaries do not respect these flags, for obvious reasons. But if you're at the point where you can inject environment vars into a devs workstation, it's probably too late for that dev.
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand the general moan about the touch bar. These are exactly the cases I think will make the touch bar great. Is it the most innovative concept ever? No, but it looks like it's been executed very well. I think developers will like this macbook.
To what exact cases are you referring? Do you not use an ide with a test runner? What exactly is desirable about triggering and monitoring this from a second display on the keyboard--where you're looking all the time, naturally--over clicking a button on screen?
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't understand the general moan about the touch bar. These are exactly the cases I think will make the touch bar great. Is it the most innovative concept ever? No, but it looks like it's been executed very well. I think developers will like this macbook.
To what exact cases are you referring? Do you not use an ide with a test runner? What exactly is desirable about triggering and monitoring this from a second display on the keyboard--where you're looking all the time, naturally--over clicking a button on screen?
Do you need a button like this on your keyboard? No, you could set up a new Vim bind. But this is more dynamic; what if the test re-run buttons were only visible after having modified a file, and replaced with a deploy or commit button if tests succeed?
If you're vigorously opposed to it, don't buy a Mac. But some people can definitely see use in it. It's like your function row, but with visibly context-aware functions.
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#106This sounds amazing, and Id love if Apple allowed touchid for regular account-password prompts in macOS 10.13 (or a Sierra point update but let's be realistic) If they integrated this down to the built in sudo/su that would be even more amazing, but I imagine that's much less likely.
They've probably implemented TouchID support using PAM. If so, using with sudo/su is just a matter of configuration.
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Remind me again how function keys can produce full colour multitouch interfaces, such as video/image scrubbers, colour pickers, etc. The standard "function keys can do anything" response is getting old.
Who cares? It's a gimmick. Video scrubbers and color pickers already exist. I don't need a silly keyboard screen to do them. The "I need to pick colors and scrub video" response is getting old. Nobody does that stuff often enough for it to be a good trade off.
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#108This here is what gets me salivating: Using the toolbar as a context-sensitive test runner/controler: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwC8SNvW8AQgeWN.png:large
Yeah, but you're ignoring the functionality loss from not having the function keys. You may not use them, but many people do. For example, in Emacs (and I'm assuming most IDEs) I can map a function key to run my tests and have a status bar entry saying how many passed or failed. It's the exact functionality in your screenshot, no touch bar required. At best the touch bar is a nice gimmick, and it's not adding anythin…
It is a nice gimmick. Is there anything wrong with an improvement, even if it's a little one?
Re: Show HN: A fork of sudo with Touch ID support
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but you're ignoring the functionality loss from not having the function keys. You may not use them, but many people do. For example, in Emacs (and I'm assuming most IDEs) I can map a function key to run my tests and have a status bar entry saying how many passed or failed. It's the exact functionality in your screenshot, no touch bar required. At best the touch bar is a nice gimmick, and it's not adding anythin…
Remind me again how function keys can produce full colour multitouch interfaces, such as video/image scrubbers, colour pickers, etc. The standard "function keys can do anything" response is getting old.
That "function keys can do anything" is, in my opinion, the exact reason they had to go. They're scary for the typical user. What is F7? You may know, but it's not obvious in any way. That some of them cause destructive actions (e.g. Alt+F4 on Windows) makes it worse - they're scary to many users. And even when after figuring out what some of them do, one is stuck wondering "was that F8? Or F9? Oh! It was F10" (which, includes the worry that a wrong guess could cause problems).
Though, I cannot believe they shipped it without the haptic feedback to make it clear that a button was actually clicked.
^ Also, none of that, to me, includes Esc. Esc seems clear enough in its intent, and I hold no ill-will toward the Esc key.