I really don’t know much about this scam thing and at the same time , no one wants to be on the losing side . But i just came across a good hacker who helped me hack my boyfriends text messages, whatsap, Facebook , Instagram messages remotely..You don’t have to touch his phone while you have access to his conversations through the software he bought and install remotely on my phone , i dont know how he did this but i think he's perfect at it.....contact him at hotcyberclown@gmail.com..Tell him Debra referred you, then you can thank me later. God Bless.
FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
111–118 of 118 posts
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I should have said 'government'. Ah, ok. Yes, the government--specifically the legislative branch--can always modify or repeal a law. > The government can always modify or repeal the act that defines their constitution and authority. If by "their" you mean "the FCC's" (or some other agency), then yes. But if by "their" you mean "the government's" in general, it's not so easy. A Constitutional amendment has a much h…
> A Constitutional amendment has a much higher threshold of passage than a simple law. You are misunderstanding the word 'constitution'. Every company and regulatory body has one. It defines who does what, and the 'what you can do, and more importantly, what you should do' of a regulatory body is defined within the act. It is not the 'american constitution'. It is created and modified during the regular practice of g…
> You are misunderstanding the word 'constitution'.
If you want to use that word in an unusual way, that's fine; but I didn't understand that that's how you were using it in reference to regulatory bodies created by US statutes. ("Statute", btw, is the usual way of referring to laws that tell what regulatory bodies can and should do.)
> You know dude, I'm not really sure you know how the government functions.
You know, I'm not really sure you know how to describe how the government functions using proper terminology. If you had said "statute" in the first place, which, as above, is the correct term for what you are referring to, I would have understood what you said right away. But you didn't.
> Your representatives create and modify acts that allocate funds to fund regulatory bodies to enforce laws.
Yes, and these are called "statutes", not a "constitution".
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
> A Constitutional amendment has a much higher threshold of passage than a simple law. You are misunderstanding the word 'constitution'. Every company and regulatory body has one. It defines who does what, and the 'what you can do, and more importantly, what you should do' of a regulatory body is defined within the act. It is not the 'american constitution'. It is created and modified during the regular practice of g…
> You are misunderstanding the word 'constitution'. If you want to use that word in an unusual way, that's fine; but I didn't understand that that's how you were using it in reference to regulatory bodies created by US statutes. ("Statute", btw, is the usual way of referring to laws that tell what regulatory bodies can and should do.) > You know dude, I'm not really sure you know how the government functions. You kno…
In different countries it is called different things. The point being, you can change it through your elected representatives if you so choose.
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
It sounds complex but it can be had for around 5 dollars a month and a good setup guide if you don't know Linux well.
Why do you need a good setup guide though? Is there no solution of similar efficacy that I can have my mom, who still uses AOL, install?
PIA
Super easy setup and config. Download the app for the VPN, generate SOCK5 cteds for the proxy via their site.
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#115"the vote was 3-2 along party lines"
for real?
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#116Nearly Meaningless in the face of Wells Fargo scandal, Wallstreet behavior in general.
The penalty will invariably be less than the gain, _if_caught_
They need to stop blocking and penalizing VPN traffic is what they need ruled. Where is that law?
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
How so? They're easy to set up, especially with a compatible router.
I mean... why is it hard for the majority of users to use linux? Why is it hard for the majority of users to use a password manager? Because most people on the planet are busy and don't give a damn .
Right, so it's not at all out of reach. You can configure your OS to use a VPN in under a minute, in my experience. Maybe five, if you were following directions.
It also takes a few minutes to change your smoke-detector batteries...
Re: FCC Vote Means Internet Providers Need Permission to Share Your Data
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
the difference is the communication act of 1934 essentially lets the FCC create laws whereby the police etc don't have that power. the power to create laws should be held by elected officials imo. the 5 leaders of the FCC get to unilaterally make regulations (laws) that affect every single citizen in america. everything from tv broadcasts to net neutrality
No, it allows them to create regulations within the framework of the act of their constitution. They can't create laws that stop someone fishing for tuna, now can they? This is the same as road/highway authorities being able to set traffic speed zones, food authorities for setting health quality regulations, health bodies regulating medicines, or any other regulatory body. You don't like it? Get you politician to cha…
except speed limits are enforced by police. huge administrative authorities have executive, law making, and judicial power.
The [Federal Trade] Commission promulgates substantive rules of conduct. The Commission then considers whether to authorize investigations into whether the Commission’s rules have been violated. If the Commission authorizes an investigation, the investigation is conducted by the Commission, which reports its findings to the Commission. If the Commission thinks that the Commission’s findings warrant an enforcement action, the Commission issues a complaint. The Commission’s complaint that a Commission rule has been violated is then prosecuted by the Commission and adjudicated by the Commission. This Commission adjudication can either take place before the full Commission or before a semi-autonomous Commission administrative law judge. If the Commission chooses to adjudicate before an administrative law judge rather than before the Commission and the decision is adverse to the Commission, the Commission can appeal to the Commission. If the Commission ultimately finds a violation, then, and only then, the affected private party can appeal to an Article III court. But the agency decision, even before the bona fide Article III tribunal, possesses a very strong presumption of correctness on matters both of fact and of law.
http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/h...