Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

techcrunch.com

101–110 of 224 posts

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#101

For odd some reason, I find myself most annoyed by the headphone situation, aka, lack of Lightning jack. Why not just make the iPhone 7 USB-C instead?

My guess is the next iPhone or the one after that will drop lightning altogether, and just use induction charging, and wireless for all I/O.

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#102
post #45

So who is making good laptops that run Linux well these days?

The Lenovo T460s is pretty great all around. I suggest Debian Testing and Gnome 3.

New Lenovo trackpads are an absolute pain in the ass to use. I rage quit my T440s for this alone because on the long run in starts grinding your gears pretty hard. I am glad you had a good experience with it but I strongly recommend anyone considering it to actually try and experiment with it for a couple hours.

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#103
post #19
post #14

I'm okay with the ports but 16 GB max RAM is a f-in joke. My mom's computer has 16 GB of RAM

What exactly are you and you're mum doing that necessitates more than 16GB?

Data mining. My mom just sends emails but inherited my old computer...

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#104
post #3

So disappointed. I had my wallet ready to order but this is no different than my current MBP. A half baked touch screen!!! Not worth the $3500 I was going to drop on a new MBP. I can't imagine going back to windows because I enjoy the terminal and vim but seriously considering it specially that now I can run bash on windows

I find it annoying that people switch OS's and compare them based on feel and "features"... If anything at least say OSX is architecturally better than windows... or get a Chromebook and Croton. This way you can use the terminal and vim, and still get amazing features thru ChromeOS

[deleted]

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#105
post #15

For odd some reason, I find myself most annoyed by the headphone situation, aka, lack of Lightning jack. Why not just make the iPhone 7 USB-C instead?

>Why not just make the iPhone 7 USB-C instead? It's too thick going forward. It's already too thick for the Pencil.

It's ridiculous that the stylus needs a port.

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#106
post #98

I genuinely don't understand the drive to make all these sacrifices just to make the computer a couple millimeters thinner. Are there people who look at the previous generation of MBP and said "that's too thick"? If so, why?

I forget who said this, but "Apple used to make good products that were mostly thin and now they make thin products that are mostly good."

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#107
post #24

It's pretty bad. We use YubiKeys a lot, and there are no ports for them. So sad. Also: Magsafe is great (it's saved my bacon a few times). Gone. ESC key, gone. Don't know about the keyboard yet, but everything I've read doesn't point to it being decent. Probably not buying this generation of MacBooks. Might just bite the bullet and finally go to Linux on some decent hardware. So, what's a decent laptop for running Li…

XPS 13, XPS 15, Precision 5100 (same as XPS 15 but configurable in every way)

and you can get 32g ram on a $2600 xps 15

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#108
post #98

I genuinely don't understand the drive to make all these sacrifices just to make the computer a couple millimeters thinner. Are there people who look at the previous generation of MBP and said "that's too thick"? If so, why?

I do, after using macbook air.

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#109
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I really don't understand why everybody seems to think the Escape key is so important. I almost never hit mine, and since the Touch Bar has a virtual escape key, I don't really see the problem. The best I can figure is everybody complaining is a Vim user, but if you're a Vim user I don't know why you haven't already replaced the cumbersome Escape key with something easier, like binding `jk`, or binding Caps Lock to C…

Your argument consists of "people who don't work like I do are wrong" and you imply they should pay the price... for using a key that's been ubiquitous since the beginning of computing time.

Pay what price, though? That's the question I'm asking. What the heck are people using the Escape key for that's so important that they can't tolerate having to tap the Touch Bar instead of having a physical key?

As for ubiquity, that doesn't mean anything. Just because we've had something for a long time doesn't mean we need to keep having it. For example, my current physical keyboard has no Insert key, but that's a key that keyboards had for a long time (my keyboard replaced that with the Eject key). And yet I didn't even notice its lack until I looked at my keyboard just now.

Re: Apple’s new MacBook Pro kills off most of the ports you probably need

#110

No Magsafe? it was one of the coolest feature on macbooks. No HDMI? No USB ports? No SD card? No Escape key.. negatively impact vi/vim experience. Basically they want you to buy adapters for everything (maybe next version will also drop the audio jack). and they call it a step forward? Surface book looks a lot better to me despite lacking in graphics specs.

I think surface book graphics are better but I'm not sure.
Post reply on HN