Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 72 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#31
post #18

Lol I graduated with a CS degree in 2004 and have been searching for an entry level software development job ever since. Google was the first and only company to call me back to tell me I didn't get the job. I think things are getting worse out there.

Was that a typo? Did you mean to type 2014?

Even that would be surprising unless OP is being very picky or lives in an area with very few programming jobs.

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#33

I've had the opposite experience. The recruiter proactively provided updates and kept me up-to-date in terms of expected timeline.

I want to meet you! I've seen so many good stories about Google recruiting online - but I guess my friends and myself aren't big enough sample size to make a valid conclusion. It is just a bit frustrating, an auto generated email costs nothing.

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#35
post #9

Lol I graduated with a CS degree in 2004 and have been searching for an entry level software development job ever since. Google was the first and only company to call me back to tell me I didn't get the job. I think things are getting worse out there.

12 Years. Sounds quite long...?

OP's been posting that same rhetoric for the past 1+ years on HN, I genuinely can't tell if they're trolling or not.

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#36
I had quite a memorable experience where a Google recruiter accidentally CC'd their post interview survey email instead of BCC. After the initial "haha" moment we discovered that almost all of the ~2k people in the email list were African American. A private LinkedIn group was started after that, although I haven't followed up with it lately.

Also for that particular interview, I waited for an hour and a half in the lobby before a recruiter finally showed up. It turned out that my recruiter was let go the day before and my interview time fell between the cracks. Pretty much the worst experience I've ever had interviewing.

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you think OP's friend is a "rando"?

Anybody who claims to be going for an executive position through front-door recruiting is a rando. Look at the SVPs at Google and look at how they got that job. Either they have been at Google since the dawn of man, or they came in through major acquisitions, or they were personally recruited by Larry Page.

He didn't go through front-door recruiting. They sought him out. He's had similar roles at major banks.

...and he still had to go through that process. Do 'mere mortals' have to do 5+ in-person interviews?

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#39

A buddy of mine interviewed for a fairly senior role at Google (SVP equivalent) and he had about 6 or 7 in-person interviews within a week or two before they went radio-silent. 6 months later they contacted him and asked him to come in for another round of interviews -- at which point he told them he was going to pass. Edit: This was a half-decade or more ago.

The idea that randos are just interviewing to be SVPs at Google doesn't seem particularly likely to me.

It's done all the time. There are entire recruiting companies which specialize in executive roles from VPs to CEOs. I assume Google's impressive recruiting department can find a qualified SVP to recruit and interview.

Re: Ask HN: Why does Google get away with such bad recruiting practices?

#40

Most big companies are terrible at recruiting. Google requires massive numbers of people so they can't spend much time or concern on any one position or one recruitee. Even my employer (non SV) can't even post positions for engineers that make any sense (which is why we get so few candidates).

There's no reason why they can auto-generate a "We have decided not to proceed with your application" email when they move your status to rejected at the very least. It costs marginally nothing.

It does when you think you might have another position for them and you don't want to burn bridges. Which I assume it likely what they're thinking.
Post reply on HN