Live data from Hacker News

Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

washingtonpost.com

251–260 of 308 posts

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have seen this before. Some people will only take a job if they KNOW how to do the job. Others will take a job, and are confident they can learn it along the way. It might have more to do with that confidence than being poor.

If you don't have a safety net you'll quickly become risk averse.

On the flip side if you don't have a lot to lose you might as well take risks.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There may be some interplay with Impostor Syndrome, but IMO what is being discussed here is a different thing, for which there may be a more specific name... but if so I'm unaware of it. Impostor syndrome is pretty much universal (insomuch as it crosses class/economy boundaries) whereas what has been mentioned here is a sort of anti-entitlement very specific to people who grew up poor. People in this situation are of…

It sounds a little like learned helplessness ... having spent some time in the UK I have noticed this unquestioning deference to "ones betters" and I wonder how it comes about. How is this trait acquired?

I got it from my father, who rose from poor to wealthy through education. He taught me that education was all that mattered. When I achieved a prestigious Silicon Valley position after dropping out of college, I considered myself a fake who would be discovered at any moment for a long time. All my colleagues had compsci degrees. Thing is, I eventually discovered that I could hold my own. What my father taught me is only one way to achieve success, as I later realized. But that he taught it as dogma crippled me for a long time.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#253
post #221
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One distinction that I like to make is that in my own life, I've definitely been poor, but I've never been in poverty. I've been a student and I've been unemployed almost without money to even get food occasionally, but I've always been in a position where I could ask my (middle-class) mother for a bit of cash to tide me over (or even move back 'home' for a while. I have never had to ask, but that option/safety net h…

I grew up poor, and after my first bout of college, I only had $400 to my name, nowhere to go, no job, and 28 days until rent was due. I spent that month freezing in an empty apartment eating potatoes with soy sauce on them. And then may landlord wants to play "this is a stupid college kid" and starts claiming that I must keep paying rent until I can find a new lessee (which I didn't.) Nevermind that I always payed m…

I remember this lifestyle pretty well, for me it was rice with various homemade sauces, a big bag of rice was $5 and that could last me a couple of weeks if it was all I ate.

One benefit is that I was an overweight child, being too poor to eat properly brought me to a "perfect" BMI for my age.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don't have a safety net you'll quickly become risk averse.

On the flip side if you don't have a lot to lose you might as well take risks.

You always have a lot to lose, especially if you're poor.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don't have a safety net you'll quickly become risk averse.

On the flip side if you don't have a lot to lose you might as well take risks.

Logically yes, but in practical psychology people tend to hold on tighter when they have less.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don't have a safety net you'll quickly become risk averse.

On the flip side if you don't have a lot to lose you might as well take risks.

This is a nihilistic approach which only works in theory - especially when you have a family to support.

And nobody has nothing to lose - I mean even poor people have a flat - but risking to lose the roof over your head would be plain stupid.

End of story - if you know papa and mama will transfer some cash if you are in need - then taking risks is easy.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There may be some interplay with Impostor Syndrome, but IMO what is being discussed here is a different thing, for which there may be a more specific name... but if so I'm unaware of it. Impostor syndrome is pretty much universal (insomuch as it crosses class/economy boundaries) whereas what has been mentioned here is a sort of anti-entitlement very specific to people who grew up poor. People in this situation are of…

It sounds a little like learned helplessness ... having spent some time in the UK I have noticed this unquestioning deference to "ones betters" and I wonder how it comes about. How is this trait acquired?

> How is this trait acquired?

It is acquired socially. The UK has a formalised class system dating back to the "divine right of kings". The "ruling elite" are rather literal as the membership of the upper house (House of Lords) is limited to hereditary peerage.

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#259

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Speaking as a relatively new parent, what your father did is unfathomable to me. It sounds like you got great skills, but need to be connected to someone who just doesn't take advantage of them. Were you working on Kerbal Space Program? Those devs surely got a raw deal too. Sadly the world is full of people caring only for themselves. But there are exceptions, and hopefully it'll be your turn to come across some of t…

Thanks. Yes, I've a couple projects. A couple are more popular than others. My own stuff has about two million total users. But for about the last four months, I've been working exclusively on creating some (combinatorial) design theory algorithms.

2 million users, that's fantastic work - and the algo stuff sounds like a page turner in the making as well. Keep at it, and please don't ever discount your own worth.

(Not that I'm massively successful myself or anything. In fact, I'm currently unemployed and seeking .net roles, after redundancy; facing difficulties with this as I have only just under 1y of .net xp even as I've done development for 20. Refreshing / learning new skills on SOLID, DDD, CQRS, EventSourcing, etc, and trying to keep chin up. I have faith and refuse to go back to my old tools that are just about dead anyway, even though there's the odd contract coming up. Love C# and .net.)

Re: Poor kids who do things right don't do better than rich kids who do things wrong

#260
post #134

"cultural fit" is a huge contributor to this limited mobility

Honestly, I think this explains quite a bit. I grew up fairly poor (single income household in Appalachia). I had to train myself out of a lot of speech patterns / mannerisms that don't fly in other parts of America. It's unfortunate, but the stereotype of inbred white trash is still alive and strong when most people hear Appalachian drawls. They hear the way we talk and immediately think we're ignorant. It's an open…

Speech patterns / mannerisms might be one factor, but looks are another:

I worked on Wall St for over a decade. I regularly walked into the corner store (Duane Reade) in a high-end suit, $300 Thomas Pink shirt, cuff-links, a tie, and shiny shoes. I also had the mannerisms i was expected to take on having gone to an Ivy League undergrad.

Still on at least 5 or 6 occasions, individuals would walk up to me and ask "oh which aisle has the detergent" as if being of Indian origin automatically made me the store keeper. They saw right through my impeccable outfit, ignored it all, and saw "the Indian store-keeper guy."

Post reply on HN