Earlier quoted context omitted.
I work in digital marketing. There is a whole scene of guys that do nothing but create simple digitally published ebooks. They will research the market for the niche. Research the topic in depth (something like frying chicken can be deciphered and recipe and method variations can be collected in 20 hours) Then create content on the niche and sell it. Even a $3 ebook can make several thousand dollars a year.
A friend of mine does exactly this with self-help books (NLP, hypnosis, dating, how to quit smoking etc.). He makes in the low five figures a month with this business. He identifies niches, by now using his existing audience. For example, he once had a blog post on a subject that received surprisingly many views. So he hired a writer to write a book about it, and then marketed it through his channels. It's surprising…
How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
31–40 of 65 posts
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#32Mark my words this won't last. It has happened to Itunes, Play Store, Steam, New Grounds and basically every website that let's users upload content for sale / ad money. I call it the fundamental problem of user generated content. At the current expected payoff, soon every schmuck will be uploading his book. Quality won't matter. Eventually the torrent of content for consumers will be more than consumers can hope to…
You'll still probably be able to make some money, but not enough to merit continued publishing.
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#33Mark my words this won't last. It has happened to Itunes, Play Store, Steam, New Grounds and basically every website that let's users upload content for sale / ad money. I call it the fundamental problem of user generated content. At the current expected payoff, soon every schmuck will be uploading his book. Quality won't matter. Eventually the torrent of content for consumers will be more than consumers can hope to…
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#34Mark my words this won't last. It has happened to Itunes, Play Store, Steam, New Grounds and basically every website that let's users upload content for sale / ad money. I call it the fundamental problem of user generated content. At the current expected payoff, soon every schmuck will be uploading his book. Quality won't matter. Eventually the torrent of content for consumers will be more than consumers can hope to…
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#35Mark my words this won't last. It has happened to Itunes, Play Store, Steam, New Grounds and basically every website that let's users upload content for sale / ad money. I call it the fundamental problem of user generated content. At the current expected payoff, soon every schmuck will be uploading his book. Quality won't matter. Eventually the torrent of content for consumers will be more than consumers can hope to…
People tend to buy paid learning material not only for the learning experience, but how it's written which is very unique to the individual who is publishing.
It doesn't matter if 5,000 other people have books on the same subject. Once I get to know an author, if his style clicks with me then I'm going to buy his book. If his style resonates with a lot of people he'll quickly rise to the top for that subject.
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#36https://www.amazon.com/Hypersphere/dp/132978152X
http://www.lulu.com/shop/anonymous/hypersphere/paperback/pro...
The 4chan /lit/ board wrote Hypersphere as a collaborative writing project but someone needed to actually publish it, something I undertook as a project, I must have spent something like 20 hours editing it (plus way more helping to write it). It has so far sold 650 copies, most of which I sold with a profit of less than a dollar in profit per book since it didn't feel right selling it for a profit to the people that helped write it.
I've since bumped the price and I'm getting something like ~$2.5 a book, and it's currently selling 5-10 copies a month. The Amazon price is far higher than the Lulu one (which was the publishing platform of choice) since they obviously want a cut.
The biggest pro of the project was that it helped me understand how to self-publish: I've given my partner two physical poetry collections about her since: something that was pretty appreciated.
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#37The A-level textbook took me about a year of all my spare time to get it together. It's the best part of 500 pages long, and covers practical and music theory elements to a level that will allow anyone to be competent enough to complete the coursework to a good standard, and more importantly to give them a good, broad grounding in the subject. It was my passion for the year it took to create it, and I learned loads (including how to use Indesign, which I bought to allow me to do a good job on the layout of the book). But the biggest thing I learned was that writing the book wasn't the most important thing, it was getting it in front of the right people. I hadn't even thought about this until I completed the book, and then found that to get it to the right people it would cost me far more than I'd reasonably expect to earn from what is a fairly niche publication (I was quoted £2000 to mail-shot all the heads of music at schools that teach music technology).
I have updated the book twice (to version 7 and 8 of the software), each taking the equivalent of over a week of full time work to update screenshots, workflow and procedures, plus add in new information as appropriate.
It was only the chance connection with the education department of the software house who makes the main software I used in the book (Cubase) that led to any significant increase in the number of sales, but it's still nowhere near what the author of this article is making; I have had one really good month in September (start of the year, and it was promoted in a newsletter), which has outdone the figure above, but usually I'll sell maybe 1 or 2 books. This is all done via Lulu, with printed versions of the book, and I've elected not to do it as an e-book as I feel the cat will be out of the bag and it'd be torrented everywhere (particularly as I set the price at £24.95, feeling that it was worth an hour's private tuition cost for such a large amount of info).
While it's nice to have a small income from this each month, it's certainly not something that works out well at an hourly rate - it would have to sell in the high hundreds to achieve this.
By contrast, the book on Sibelius has sold much better as I've sold it via Amazon as well as via Lulu. The reasoning for this was simple, really - I did it as a test to see how different sales would be via Amazon, and they've been much larger (about 7:1). But this is countered by the payments; I actually put the price of the book up before selling it because otherwise I would have seen almost nothing from an Amazon sale. At the moment the book is £7.95, and I see just over £1. For the other book, if I sold it via Amazon, I would see £3 from the £24.95 sale price (compared with about £12 via a Lulu sale). I'm not sure if I would get 4x as many sales from the Cubase book if sold via Amazon (particuarly as I think most of the sales are driven via recommendation rather than browsing), but as I said before, this is not an area I even gave a moment's thought to until I completed the book.
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#38Mark my words this won't last. It has happened to Itunes, Play Store, Steam, New Grounds and basically every website that let's users upload content for sale / ad money. I call it the fundamental problem of user generated content. At the current expected payoff, soon every schmuck will be uploading his book. Quality won't matter. Eventually the torrent of content for consumers will be more than consumers can hope to…
I disagree.
There is no a priori "expected passive income for a given creative person". Some creators might have such expectations of course, but they are make believe unless they are validated by actual sales.
There's only what the consumers actually deem appropriate to spend on one's works.
Besides, everybody believes they are the ones that have the merit in a meritocracy. Even when they produce objectively crap, or maybe good stuff that's not to the tastes of the general public.
>The thing all these sites have in common is that they promised to be a meritocracy for creative types.
Well, here's the main issue. Meritocracy in the book market, whether Amazon or physical books, is not based on the merit of quality (which can be subjective anyway), but on the sole merit of "consumer preference".
Which is also the reason why most of the people would first buy a "Star Wars" box-set rather than, say, a Kurosawa one, or buy Robert Ludlum over Graham Green.
>Go to the app store. How much stuff is in the new section? How much looks good.
More of it looks good than what I can follow/download, or even have a use for (because not everybody has the same use cases). E.g. for mobile painting there are at least 5 excellent apps. I don't have a use for another 100, even if they do exist.
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#392. Past, not future: This is historical revenue based on active marketing. It is unlikely that it will bring the same income in the future without marketing.
3. Revenue, not profit: The nice cover design is something others would need to pay for if this is to serve as reference, but this cost isn't taken into account.
TLDR: He isn't making $400 ($360) in passive monthly income and it is unlikely he will in the future.
Re: How I make $400 a month in Passive Income by Self-Publishing
#40A little off-topic, but I found this interesting: > "Specifically, a lot of the traditional guys price e-books at $20–30, often times more than the paperback/hardcover, which is so stupid." It catches my eye when people get stuck on an e-book version costing more than a hard copy. It's funny that a Kindle version can be more valuable (instant delivery, easier to carry around, and a more enjoyable reading experience)…
That's a bizarro reasoning.
Obviously it's not about the value added because of extra functionality, it's about the new technology having lower marginal costs (and all that functionality comes basically for free), and publishers still charging as if they still incur the full physical production and distribution costs.
When commercial music records first came out in the late 19th century, they cost quite a lot -- but that was justifiable because it was a new technology, with big costs to manufacture, carry, etc.
Would you justify paying the same amount for an mp3 today, just because it's more convenient and it sounds way better than those disks?