Kermit was in the same space as Zmodem. I remember it fondly, as they were very progressive around "open source" way back in the early 90's, and probably earlier. They accepted what was essentially a "pull request" over USENET discussions forums from me to add a feature. http://www.kermitproject.org/ckfaq.html
ZMODEM
61–70 of 103 posts
Re: ZMODEM
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup, the first problem with Xmodem was that it transferred sectors (as in CP/M) and thus file size was always padded with zeros to a multiple fof 128 bytes. Then came Ymodem which fixed this, and then Zmodem which was considerably faster (windowing protocol) and allowed resuming interrupted transfers and handled CRC checksums.
The resume was the clincher. You'd spent over an hour getting 3/4 the way through downloading an enormous 1M file to drop to line noise. OK, start again... Saving 400+ for a Courier HST to go an insanely fast 12k (very rarely). They beat everything else at holding a line though.
I had a project ~15 years ago with several thousand FAX Clients, and interestingly we had problems with every hardware card or modem we used except the (even then quite old) U-1496E which worked without flaw, whatever customer send data.
Re: ZMODEM
#63Re: ZMODEM
#64This submission is a ploy by the NSA and advertisers to further refine their demographic slot of "old hackers". Kermit, zmodem, bbs, baud. South Park's Member Berries are in full force here. CoCo forever!
I miss the BBS days. Very few non-geeks around. The internet just isn't the same.
Re: ZMODEM
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
>At the time, it what somewhat novel to be able to get the source code at all Really? IIRC, in Jason Scott's excellent BBS documentary (you should go watch it. Like, right now. It's that good), Thom Henderson (from SEA. Remember them? I don't, because I wasn't alive. Which is why I have to rely on documentaries) said that it was expected in UNIX circles, which is where Kermit originated. Or were you on PC? I don't kn…
"... Jason Scott's excellent BBS documentary (you should go watch it. Like, right now. It's that good)" Agreed. The BBS documentary is superb and really, really entertaining and engrossing. Especially the episode(s) on fidonet.
Re: ZMODEM
#66My impression of zmodem and kermit, from 13 years ago (remembering then from a decade prior's use): http://dmd.3e.org/2003/12/zmodem-vs-kermit/
Re: ZMODEM
#67> Introduced 1986; 30 years ago Now I feel old. I remember when this was new and clever. Made downloading from BBS's much nicer over XModem. At 2400 baud or whatever was current then!
Some years later, just before BBSes were obsoleted by the internet, several multiplexing protocols appeared which let you chat or play a MUD while downloading or even upload and download at the same time.
Can't remember any names, but these protocols were only popular for a very brief time before the internet took over.
I also recall some BBSes survived a while into the internet age by adding telnet ports. You ran your normal dialer software with a telnet driver that took the hostname as the phone number and then would end up running ZModem and the likes over telnet.
Re: ZMODEM
#68Looking b ack at stuff like Zmodem, it's instructive to compare the computing culture then and now. Back then, everything was so cryptic . Documentation was hard to find printed books, code and config was extremely abbreviated ( sometimes for legitimate technical reasons of storage capacity). It was all very off-putting unless you put w lot of effort into research, or ran in the social circles that already had data a…
The most striking thing to me was there was a huge amount of free-as-in-beer software powering the entire BBS "network" and lots of helpful communities but almost nothing was open source.
Re: ZMODEM
#69Re: ZMODEM
#70It's still hard to match the convenience of moving files to and from a server with RZ/SZ. If your terminal emulator supports it, it will see the trigger sequence emitted and start the modem protocol over your ssh connection and save the file. Since it runs over your current ssh connection it's perfectly secure. It's so much easier then switching to a local terminal to use scp to get or put a local file. Sure, I know…
[1] https://grack.com/blog/2011/10/26/automatic-file-transfer-in...