I remember having issues verifying emails with attachments last time I've used dkimverify.
Any insight into what breaks verification is useful. Thanks!
Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
11–20 of 38 posts
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#12There has been no evidence yet that the emails were doctored. What there has been, as one journalist put it, was efforts to conflate "wikileaks emails" with "unsourced shit I saw on Twitter".
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#13Yes, the interesting thing would be if any emails with controversial content can be verified. I don't think there were any real bombshells in the wikileaks emails, but still...
"I don't think there were any real bombshells in the wikileaks emails, but still..." Yes, there are quite a few bombshells. There are now tags of twitter about specific e-mails. If you are a Bernie Sanders fan, then the level of betrayal and cheating is astounding. Never mind the e-mails that shows the staged violence at Trump rallies. If this was a Republican candidate, it would be criminal charge time with the Proj…
Specific examples that are in your opinion most worthy of authentication?
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#14Some quick numbers for those interested:
Excel sheet has 11104 rows 2423 verified - 22% 8681 not verified - 78%
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I don't think there were any real bombshells in the wikileaks emails, but still..." Yes, there are quite a few bombshells. There are now tags of twitter about specific e-mails. If you are a Bernie Sanders fan, then the level of betrayal and cheating is astounding. Never mind the e-mails that shows the staged violence at Trump rallies. If this was a Republican candidate, it would be criminal charge time with the Proj…
Specific examples that are in your opinion most worthy of authentication?
I'm at work so, and I'll get the rest later tonight (Twitter won't load for me now anyway):
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3023
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808
wow, what the heck, I'll get more later but a lot of sites just aren't loading
[edit: guess its not just me https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12762397 ]
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#16Yes, the interesting thing would be if any emails with controversial content can be verified. I don't think there were any real bombshells in the wikileaks emails, but still...
"I don't think there were any real bombshells in the wikileaks emails, but still..." Yes, there are quite a few bombshells. There are now tags of twitter about specific e-mails. If you are a Bernie Sanders fan, then the level of betrayal and cheating is astounding. Never mind the e-mails that shows the staged violence at Trump rallies. If this was a Republican candidate, it would be criminal charge time with the Proj…
Project Veritas has been found to be deceptive and when officials actually have inspected the claims in their previous videos they found that “sometimes a fuller truth is found on the cutting room floor.”
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I don't think there were any real bombshells in the wikileaks emails, but still..." Yes, there are quite a few bombshells. There are now tags of twitter about specific e-mails. If you are a Bernie Sanders fan, then the level of betrayal and cheating is astounding. Never mind the e-mails that shows the staged violence at Trump rallies. If this was a Republican candidate, it would be criminal charge time with the Proj…
Project Veritas has been found to be deceptive and when officials actually have inspected the claims in their previous videos they found that “sometimes a fuller truth is found on the cutting room floor.”
Project Veritas has waited a couple of days each time and released the whole video with no cuts. That little quote is the refrain spoken to dismiss the video, but doesn't take into account that they do release the whole run unlike major news channels as we found out with the creative editing Katie Couric did recently.
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Specific examples that are in your opinion most worthy of authentication?
I'm at work so, and I'll get the rest later tonight (Twitter won't load for me now anyway): https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3023 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808 wow, what the heck, I'll get more later but a lot of sites just aren't loading [edit: guess its not just me https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12762397 ]
This pretty much just shows that some people in the DNC were kinda biased and played politics. It's literally their job to do what they think is best for the party and that seems to be what they are doing (whether I agree with them is a different matter but currently besides the point).
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Project Veritas has been found to be deceptive and when officials actually have inspected the claims in their previous videos they found that “sometimes a fuller truth is found on the cutting room floor.”
Project Veritas has waited a couple of days each time and released the whole video with no cuts. That little quote is the refrain spoken to dismiss the video, but doesn't take into account that they do release the whole run unlike major news channels as we found out with the creative editing Katie Couric did recently.
I wasn't aware of that. I'll have to look at the whole videos later
Re: Verifying Wikileaks DKIM-Signatures
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm at work so, and I'll get the rest later tonight (Twitter won't load for me now anyway): https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3023 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808 wow, what the heck, I'll get more later but a lot of sites just aren't loading [edit: guess its not just me https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12762397 ]
This pretty much just shows that some people in the DNC were kinda biased and played politics. It's literally their job to do what they think is best for the party and that seems to be what they are doing (whether I agree with them is a different matter but currently besides the point).
I'm pretty sure a Bernie Sanders supporter would say this goes way beyond that. Leaking plans from one candidate to another is beyond best for the party.