Massive Dyn DNS outage
121–130 of 302 posts
Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#122Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#123GitHub, Twitter down for me in Pakistan.
Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#124 $ dig +trace github.com
; > DiG 9.8.3-P1 > +trace github.com
[...]
;; Received 488 bytes from 192.228.79.201#53(192.228.79.201) in 154 ms
github.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.p16.dynect.net.
github.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.p16.dynect.net.
github.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.p16.dynect.net.
github.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.p16.dynect.net.
;; Received 178 bytes from 192.42.93.30#53(192.42.93.30) in 54 ms
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reachedRe: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#125 $ nslookup github.com
;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 8.8.8.8, trying next server
Server: 10.0.0.1
Address: 10.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: github.com
Address: 192.30.253.112
$ nslookup twitter.com
;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 8.8.8.8, trying next server
;; Got SERVFAIL reply from 8.8.4.4, trying next server
Server: 10.0.0.1
Address: 10.0.0.1#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: twitter.com
Address: 199.16.156.102
Name: twitter.com
Address: 199.16.156.230
Name: twitter.com
Address: 199.16.156.198
Name: twitter.com
Address: 199.16.156.70Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#126Issue came from dynect.net: $ dig +trace github.com ; > DiG 9.8.3-P1 > +trace github.com [...] ;; Received 488 bytes from 192.228.79.201#53(192.228.79.201) in 154 ms github.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.p16.dynect.net. github.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.p16.dynect.net. github.com. 172800 IN NS ns2.p16.dynect.net. github.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.p16.dynect.net. ;; Received 178 bytes from 192.42.93.30#53(192.42.93.30) in 54 ms ;; conne…
Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#127Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#128GitHub employee here. We're monitoring an incident with our upstream DNS provider: https://twitter.com/githubstatus/status/789433336083001344
Re: Massive Dyn DNS outage
#129All this talk about redundancy, real-time apps, scalable architecture and and a "simple" DDOS against DNS architecture brings half of the internet down. Honestly did nobody think about having a spare dns at some other company? or even backup dns server exactly for a situation like that?
If ONLY they had 10X developers ... EDIT: joking aside, the issue with multiple DNS providers is primarily (in my experience at the company I'm at having investigated this in the past) intelligent DNS entries. Example, 'return these A records, in this order, based on the number of requests, roughly balanced'. There's no universal standard, just common aspects. DNS Provider A has one set of features, names for returni…